Margarita Ma Posted March 30, 2017 Share Posted March 30, 2017 Since by the seventh word it has given up being impartial and unbiased I've given up reading it as a credible source of anything. Am I to take this to mean that you believe the Nuclear Industry spokespersons to be impartial? Or is it that you prefer to read and listen to opinions that agree with your current viewpoint. Incidentally There was a news report a couple of days ago about increased costs of decommissioning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbeliever Posted March 30, 2017 Share Posted March 30, 2017 Am I to take this to mean that you believe the Nuclear Industry spokespersons to be impartial? Or is it that you prefer to read and listen to opinions that agree with your current viewpoint. Incidentally There was a news report a couple of days ago about increased costs of decommissioning. Is that you accusing somebody else of confirmation bias. That's going to have me laughing all day long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 we have enough natural resources without this. "We" don't. Natural resources belong to somebody- the landowner, the Crown, etc.- and they're there to be used- or else why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 "We" don't. Natural resources belong to somebody- the landowner, the Crown, etc.- and they're there to be used- or else why? Wow, this is a really big political if not to say philosophical question. If the resource is natural how can it belong to anyone? Using the logic that everything belongs to someone how long will it be before we are charged for breathing? Look at why natural resources, such as oil, gas and land belong to someone and it's territorial theft or spoils of war which has ensured that the winners of fights end up owning these things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 If the resource is natural how can it belong to anyone? Something described correctly as 'natural' in this context is something not man-made but found ready-made. So coal is but steel isn't. See? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 Something described correctly as 'natural' in this context is something not man-made but found ready-made. So coal is but steel isn't. See? So coal doesn't belong to someone then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 So coal doesn't belong to someone then? Yes, it does. It belongs to either: a. the freeholder beneath whose land it is located; or b. the Crown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onewheeldave Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 Yes, it does. It belongs to either: a. the freeholder beneath whose land it is located; or b. the Crown. It actually belongs to no-one. Because you, and a large segment of the population are deluded into believing it 'belongs' to someone, and, support the use of violence to maintain said delusion, the delusion is perpetuated and thus an army of complicit apologists is able to punish those (few) astute enough see through the delusion. That's how I see it, anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted April 2, 2017 Share Posted April 2, 2017 It actually belongs to no-one. Because you, and a large segment of the population are deluded into believing it 'belongs' to someone, and, support the use of violence to maintain said delusion, the delusion is perpetuated and thus an army of complicit apologists is able to punish those (few) astute enough see through the delusion. That's how I see it, anyway So you don't understand how the system of land ownership works. That's therefore your fault, not the system's! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RootsBooster Posted April 3, 2017 Share Posted April 3, 2017 Yes, it does. It belongs to either: a. the freeholder beneath whose land it is located; or b. the Crown. I'm no expert, but doesn't the Infrastructure Act 2015 make this obsolete? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now