I1L2T3 Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 Is this why you object to fracking, because methane is a molecule? Haha, no. This started because somebody said fracking sites generate energy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivanava Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 A fact that had inaccuracies it's claimed. Maybe you could plagiarise another fact that would counter obelix's claim. Be careful to quote next time to avoid the accusation of plagiarism . He's the one making the claim, its for him to prove not for me to disprove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 Why are you so hung up on methane being a molecule? Also why do you think that I need educating in this fact? In fact whay are you so hung up about this at all.... whatever... As I recall you intially objected about methane not being energy. I'm glad to see that you have finally realised that this is not the case and in fact it does have energy within it. ---------- Post added 21-01-2014 at 17:39 ---------- Copied something that you didn't understand, with factual errors in it - that worked out well for you didn't it. Plagiarism by the way is passing off someone else's work as your own which is what you did. Try not to do it. It's a form of dishonesty many people dislike. Yes it has energy but it is not energy. I've never denied it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 He's the one making the claim, its for him to prove not for me to disprove. He made two claims, one of which is without doubt correct. Most honest folk would reference others work. If you don't reference or quote and carry it as your own, then don't get miffed when you're pulled on it. As has been said, it's very dishonest, but considering your form that doesn't come as a shock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivanava Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 He made two claims, one of which is without doubt correct. Most honest folk would reference others work. If you don't reference or quote and carry it as your own, then don't get miffed when you're pulled on it. As has been said, it's very dishonest, but considering your form that doesn't come as a shock. I'm not miffed, and I don't give a rats what you think, I copied and pasted from a reliable source to prove someones silliness was wrong, get over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 He's the one making the claim, its for him to prove not for me to disprove. If you're going to go to the bother of changing your identity once more, surely you could make a bit more of an effort to change your posting style? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivanava Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 If you're going to go to the bother of changing your identity once more, surely you could make a bit more of an effort to change your posting style? If you have a problem with my membership of SF, take it to the help desk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 (edited) I'm not miffed, and I don't give a rats what you think, I copied and pasted from a reliable source to prove someones silliness was wrong, get over it. Reliable or not you used it as your own..that makes you a charlatan http://www.thefreedictionary.com/charlatan It's difficult to get over something if they keep appearing in differing troll guises. You're a fake. Edited January 21, 2014 by ronthenekred Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeMac Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 No they don't, they can react together to produce energy, but until they do they are both matter. . Nope. Matter and energy are interchangeable. That is a central tenet of quantum theory, which is our best attempt so far to unravel the true nature of matter. ---------- Post added 21-01-2014 at 19:24 ---------- Yes it has energy but it is not energy. I've never denied it. See above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivanava Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 Reliable or not you used it as your own..that makes you a charlatan http://www.thefreedictionary.com/charlatan It's difficult to get over something if they keep appearing in differing troll guises. You're a fake. :hihi: Get over it, before you give yourself an heart attack, the world isn't going to end just because I copied and pasted something to prove someone wrong. ---------- Post added 21-01-2014 at 19:33 ---------- Nope. Matter and energy are interchangeable. I've already said that but thanks for agreeing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now