Rampent Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 The Housemartins had the right idea on the Royals. He he. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw47 Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 Every country has a head of state (except somalia for a while, but lets not go there to that filthy revolting hellhole of an excuse for a country) We like our head of state. Tis good. And annoys the sort of people who think Mao is cool. You have no chance of changing this. Get over it. So, you completely accept my remarks about you & your ilk being subservient,subjugated, commoners? Quite right too, you know your place. What's all this crap about assuming that people who don't like royalty are socialists or communists by the way? I appreciate that in order to be a royalist you need to be a bit thick, but really! For your enlightenment ,I ran my own company & am an out & out capitalist, the only thing thicker than a communist is a royalist. At least communist philosophy is an attempt to try & do something for the common good. Complete load of horlicks of course, goes against human nature to an unacceptable degree. Monarchists on the other hand are pathetic, a group of people who readily accept that someone can be 'better' than them simply by being born into a particular family. ---------- Post added 23-07-2013 at 23:42 ---------- Get a hobby mate. Care to explain that remark my servile friend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 This Republican would rather an elected head of state (or none at all) than someone who just happened to be born to a certain family. It just seems bizarre to me to defer to someone based on a family tree. I don't defer to anyone. I certainly wouldn't defer to some union/big business backed washed up politician. I hate politicians. Apart from mecky (sorry mate ;)) who loves all Labour ones, I'll struggle to find anyone who has a grudging respect for any of them. Republicans want another. I can see the argument to get rid of royalty but I can see a bigger and more pressing argument for sorting out the big bucket if crap that is British politics and politicians. The world, it appears has an interest and maybe a passing respect for the royal family. I dint think that applys to Blair Brown or Cameron. ---------- Post added 23-07-2013 at 23:46 ---------- So, you completely accept my remarks about you & your ilk being subservient,subjugated, commoners? Quite right too, you know your place. What's all this crap about assuming that people who don't like royalty are socialists or communists by the way? I appreciate that in order to be a royalist you need to be a bit thick, but really! For your enlightenment ,I ran my own company & am an out & out capitalist, the only thing thicker than a communist is a royalist. At least communist philosophy is an attempt to try & do something for the common good. Complete load of horlicks of course, goes against human nature to an unacceptable degree. Monarchists on the other hand are pathetic, a group of people who readily accept that someone can be 'better' than them simply by being born into a particular family. ---------- Post added 23-07-2013 at 23:42 ---------- Care to explain that remark my servile friend? So you dont sound as bitter and spiteful towards people who don't have to same ideology as you. You'll get an ulcer. And I'm not servile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw47 Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 I don't defer to anyone. I certainly wouldn't defer to some union/big business backed washed up politician. I hate politicians. Apart from mecky (sorry mate ;)) who loves all Labour ones, I'll struggle to find anyone who has a grudging respect for any of them. Republicans want another. I can see the argument to get rid of royalty but I can see a bigger and more pressing argument for sorting out the big bucket if cheap that is British politics and politicians. The world, it appears has an interest and maybe a passing respect for the royal family. I dint think that applys to Blair Brown or Cameron. No, the world has an interest in the royal family. And why not? It's like Big Brother & Celebrity Get me out of here only better. There's Castles, Jewell's & the never ending saga of when William takes a mistress. Don't confuse interest with respect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 So, you completely accept my remarks about you & your ilk being subservient,subjugated, commoners? Quite right too, you know your place. What's all this crap about assuming that people who don't like royalty are socialists or communists by the way? I appreciate that in order to be a royalist you need to be a bit thick, but really! For your enlightenment ,I ran my own company & am an out & out capitalist, the only thing thicker than a communist is a royalist. At least communist philosophy is an attempt to try & do something for the common good. Complete load of horlicks of course, goes against human nature to an unacceptable degree. Monarchists on the other hand are pathetic, a group of people who readily accept that someone can be 'better' than them simply by being born into a particular family. ---------- Post added 23-07-2013 at 23:42 ---------- Care to explain that remark my servile friend? Being that cross about life isn't healthy. Bile will build up and can be hazardous to health. Seek medical attention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 No, the world has an interest in the royal family. And why not? It's like Big Brother & Celebrity Get me out of here only better. There's Castles, Jewell's & the never ending saga of when William takes a mistress. Don't confuse interest with respect. So heads of state also want an audience with Jordan and Phil Tuffnel as well as the queen? That I wouldn't have guessed. Seriously though, how do you know? I'm guessing to be honest but you seem to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw47 Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 I don't defer to anyone. I certainly wouldn't defer to some union/big business backed washed up politician. I hate politicians. Apart from mecky (sorry mate ;)) who loves all Labour ones, I'll struggle to find anyone who has a grudging respect for any of them. Republicans want another. I can see the argument to get rid of royalty but I can see a bigger and more pressing argument for sorting out the big bucket if crap that is British politics and politicians. The world, it appears has an interest and maybe a passing respect for the royal family. I dint think that applys to Blair Brown or Cameron. ---------- Post added 23-07-2013 at 23:46 ---------- So you dont sound as bitter and spiteful towards people who don't have to same ideology as you. You'll get an ulcer. And I'm not servile. No I'm not bitter just disappointed in the failure of my country to grow up. And yes you are servile. In what other way could you possibly describe someone who accepts being referred to as a 'subject' from the verb subjugate 'conquer & bring under control' & ,commoner' 'one of the ordinary or common people as opposed to the aristocracy'. That is the way you are thought of ,& referred to, by the people who you so obviously look up to & admire. You are in fact sad & pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 No I'm not bitter just disappointed in the failure of my country to grow up. And yes you are servile. In what other way could you possibly describe someone who accepts being referred to as a 'subject' from the verb subjugate 'conquer & bring under control' & ,commoner' 'one of the ordinary or common people as opposed to the aristocracy'. That is the way you are thought of ,& referred to, by the people who you so obviously look up to & admire. You are in fact sad & pathetic. You do understand why you and other royal haters come across as pea and ham up the walls infantile whiners throwing teddy out of the cot about entirely the wrong issue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 No I'm not bitter just disappointed in the failure of my country to grow up. And yes you are servile. In what other way could you possibly describe someone who accepts being referred to as a 'subject' from the verb subjugate 'conquer & bring under control' & ,commoner' 'one of the ordinary or common people as opposed to the aristocracy'. That is the way you are thought of ,& referred to, by the people who you so obviously look up to & admire. You are in fact sad & pathetic. I don't accept any of those things. You are bonkers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw47 Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 Being that cross about life isn't healthy. Bile will build up and can be hazardous to health. Seek medical attention. You are without doubt a very sad person. You lack the ability to present a reasoned point of view & use the tactics of a child in an attempt to continue the discussion. Also you run away when someone presents you with a serious thought. Not surprising of course, I have never encountered a royalist yet who could sustain a reasoned argument as to why the descendents of thugs, thieves & murderers should be held in high regard & allowed the unearned privileges which they enjoy. ---------- Post added 24-07-2013 at 00:29 ---------- I don't accept any of those things. You are bonkers. Really? So in other words you have no comprehension whatsoever as to what being a subject entails? This is hilarious, seriously, you are bringing stupidity into disrepute :hihi: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.