Phanerothyme Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 If teaching politics was obscenely well paid, there'd be more right-wing politics teachers. So a bit of an own goal there by the tories, grinding the FE sector into the dust in the 80s - I was taught politics by a town councillor for the Liberal party (post SDP liberal, so pretty leftist - he even had a bust of VI Lenin on his desk). He would get the whole class to recite his (not Lenin's) favourite mantra: "What is the biggest room in the world?" "The room for improvement" Not content with being a leftie, he was also a twunt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 In the 80s I was taught economics by a chap who had been an economist at the National Farmers Union. He was pretty right wing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanerothyme Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Should there be more left-wing economics teachers I wonder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 What "mental achievement"? That would be difficult to explain considering your level of education. Mind wealth over financial wealth may go to help you understand though. What "ground breaking comments" have you made? Non, but I'm not one one who constantly blabbers out one liners about the left as though it was some sort of philosophical revelation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeX Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Why aren't there any right wing libertarians on that chart? Milton Friedman was a right wing libertarian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RootsBooster Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Silly Left & Rightists Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeX Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Silly Left & Rightists well if you don't know which side you dress, your trousers can become a little uncomfortable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RootsBooster Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 well if you don't know which side you dress, your trousers can become a little uncomfortable Why "wear trousers" ? Just go au naturel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saunaman Posted July 31, 2013 Author Share Posted July 31, 2013 Prof Matthew Flinders recently got himself quoted in the Star as saying that the destruction of quangos wasn't working , and that this would be a blow to Ukip who campaign against quangos . This article is therefore on public record . Please have a look at Professor Flinders' pretentious article entitled " Beastly Eastleigh and the "none of the above party" ". ( sorry Mods , work full-time and haven't yet worked out how to do links ). Is it just me , or do any of you think that a "highly respected" ie Labour-supporting politics professor is unable to work out why working class people are turning away from the 3 main political parties ? When the average person on the street can tell you exactly why ? Jeeeeez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eccentric Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 It is so very old-fashioned to be left-wing or right-wing. I can conceive of myself as nothing else than a green objectivist anarcho-libertarian meritocrat. I hate the collective, because I hate dealing with people. That would make me right-wing. But wait — right-wing means supporting family values and a big society, doesn’t it? I am effectively against both families and society. Equal opportunity? All in favour of it, and I shouldn’t mind paying taxes to further other people’s schooling and emancipation. It follows that I can be neither right-wing nor left-wing. Ergo: no party represents what I, as an individual, stand for. The distinction is clearly outdated. As for Ukippers — well, somehow being a foreigner from the evil heart of the EU does not seem to prevent me from, frankly, knowing more about Britain than most of them do, and certainly not from speaking better English than they do. They rather remind me of that Swiss politician; Blocher, I think his name was. He was massive for a few years, ranting about the encroachment of the EU and UN on Swiss sovereignty, foreigners draining social security and minarets spoiling the beauteous vistas of the Alps. It held sway for a couple of years, but his might has now dwindled considerably. Populist parties that gain power in the end always prove to be terrible at actually governing a country. One need only recall the Pim Fortuyn party in Holland that made a gargantuan breakthrough after his murder. Their cabinet lasted for about 3 months, mainly owing to infighting and unpredictability. That is exactly what UKIP is like. Without Farage, they would soon knock one another’s heads in and disband. Parties that live on ill-thought through gut feelings and irrationality are by definition unstable. So the answer is: no, to teach politics, you have to be aware of what politics is. Frenetically shouting vacuous slogans bewrays a lack of such awareness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.