Jeffrey Shaw Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 In a school of say five hundred pupils how is she supposed to know the dietary requirements of every pupil,i would say its up to the nut allergic child to ask before ordering the food if it contains nuts. See last post by angos and my comment on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 Again, yes- so why wasn't there for Halal requirements? We don't know that there wasn't, all we've heard is what the aggrieved party had to say about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgeway84 Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 Didn't the child ask for pork? Looks like its her fault she got served it and the parents fault for not bringing her up properly. Then the school for not having some colour card system in place. Instead a working stuff was expected to have the mind of Rain Man. Strangely she was the least powerful player in this game so the buck stopped with her as it does these days. It should have stopped with her superior. Perhaps the headmaster should resign? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angos Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 Didn't the child ask for pork? Looks like its her fault she got served it and the parents fault for not bringing her up properly. Then the school for not having some colour card system in place. Instead a working stuff was expected to have the mind of Rain Man. Strangely she was the least powerful player in this game so the buck stopped with her as it does these days. It should have stopped with her superior. Perhaps the headmaster should resign? No she was offered gammon and possibly accepted it because she didn't know it was pork. Or she wanted to try it despite knowing it was pork. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgeway84 Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 Child's fault then, she wasn't a toddler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angos Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 Child's fault then, she wasn't a toddler. Or the parents fault to trying to impose an unrealistic ban on some food’s that are readily available to everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgeway84 Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 Or the parents fault to trying to impose an unrealistic ban on some food’s that are readily available to everyone. I'd agree with that. Their daughter should have been taught to ask if the food is correct not just eat what she wants like most kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 A child may not realise that 'gammon' = 'pork'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peer Gynt Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 In your opinion. But in fact kosher and halal killing cause no pain whatsoever to the animal. Compare and contrast electric bolt stunning, a barbarity that should be outlawed. You've been reading too many books. Go and look up some videos on Halal meat slaughter. The electric pads on a pig or any other animal for that matter stun, the bolt into the brain also stuns. Cutting a live animals throat is not painless, maybe you should try it. I've seen animals put to death by the halal method, it is not instantaneous or pain free, to see them chocking on their own blood whilst they gurgle and struggle compared to being pre stunned would soon change your mind ---------- Post added 05-08-2013 at 21:41 ---------- A child may not realise that 'gammon' = 'pork'. She should have been taught to ask. ---------- Post added 05-08-2013 at 21:42 ---------- No she was offered gammon and possibly accepted it because she didn't know it was pork. Or she wanted to try it despite knowing it was pork. She was asked what she wanted and pointed to the Gammon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 Consider the 'paper cut' test. Most people using photocopier paper have inadvertently cut a finger on the sharp edge. It's noticed only later, when one sees a drop of blood that seeped out onto other paper. That's just from paper. A trained slaughterman's knife is way sharper than that. The animal feels nothing at all. Cutting the main artery causes instantaneous loss of blood pressure in the brain and consequent absence of any pain whatsoever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.