poppet2 Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 She was going to make an important announcement. Then she was killed. We will never know what that was. The only camera in the tunnel that didn't work, happened to be the one that could have shown us the crash. Why was the owner of the white fiat owner, found dead in his tourched car? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dosxuk Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 There are a lot less public methods of bumping someone off than a car crash in the centre of one of the most well known cities on the planet. There are plenty of "accidents" which could be arranged at someone's home where access and evidence can be tightly controlled. Then there's things that take time to manifest themselves, like poisoning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna B Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 Convenient? It turned her into a martyr who could do no wrong in the eyes of a lot of people. So she had a b/f who was a playboy - remember in those days hardly anyone was paranoid about Muslims - the word was hardly in anyones vocabulary - **** was. As for the letter she might have been concerned about the quality of Al-Fayeds chauffers as much as anything I doubt the out of touch royal family envisaged the aftermath of her death. When you're head of the Church of England I wouldn't think you'd welcome the mother of the future king marrying into Islam - crikey, they can't even marry Catholics without risking the throne. As for the letter, she actually mentioned it was her husband who was trying to bump her off. Then there was the Queen herself warning Paul Burrell of 'Dark forces at work.' after the attempts to discredit his character / evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mafya Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 The truth will come out one day, just like the truth about the hillsborough tragedy did all these years later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dosxuk Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 The truth will come out one day, just like the truth about the hillsborough tragedy did all these years later. If so, you'd have thought that, like the Hillsborough tragedy, there would be more than just rumours of wrong doing. Where are the witnesses who actually saw something else happen? For the current Diana story to be so well knitted together and basically watertight, it either means that it's true and it was an accident, or the people responsible have more power than we can imagine and the real story will never get out. Either way I doubt very much that in 20 years time they'll open a new enquiry and find out it was actually caused by a man behind a grassy knoll shooting a poison dart at the driver. Unfortunately it's in human nature to believe that people so popular can suffer from the same accidents and disasters that befall the rest of us. Just being the people's princess does not make one immune to the dangers of car crashes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penistone999 Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 The people. Dont mate...........you will only encourage the conspiracy nutcases to come out with even more crackpot claims. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vResistance Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 The French expert who examined the car following the crash found all the seatbelts serviceable. When Operation Paget examined the car a good seven or eight years later the one where Diana was sitting was found to be jammed. See page 421 of the Operation Paget report. http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/news/nol/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/14_12_06_diana_report.pdf Why would an assassin have just put one seatbelt out of commission - how would he know which seat she'd use - or indeed which car they'd have taken? If the seatbelt was working then it is odd she wasn't wearing it in that situation. Let's say for arguments sake she was too distracted by the goings on and simply didn't think to. I don't think at the speed they were going it mattered much if she was wearing it or not, in fact her injuries could have been worse. In some respects she came off better than the driver, she was said to be conscious and talking after the accident. ---------- Post added 19-08-2013 at 00:10 ---------- Tinfoilhat time Oh, how I've missed you guys. So funny. ---------- Post added 19-08-2013 at 00:26 ---------- It was financed by Mohamed Al-Fayed - the guy who made loads of allegations yet didn't present one single shred of evidence at the inquest. So what evidence did you expect him to produce? He had suspicions for good reason. There is plenty of evidence of a cover up, if it was a simple accident then why would they need to cover anything up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 I don't think at the speed they were going it mattered much if she was wearing it or not, in fact her injuries could have been worse. In some respects she came off better than the driver, she was said to be conscious and talking after the accident. So what evidence did you expect him to produce? He had suspicions for good reason. There is plenty of evidence of a cover up, if it was a simple accident then why would they need to cover anything up? So an impact at 65 mph makes no difference to the internal injuries you can suffer if you're not wearing a seatbelt - kinda defies expert testimony... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-492138/Seatbelts-saved-lives-Diana-Dodi.html If Al-Fayed had good reasons to suspect something untoward why didn't he bring evidence to the inquest, in open court, with the worlds press there? What has been covered up about the accident - please explain......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clown Shoes Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 She's dead and been dead a long time. There has already been countless enquires. How much is another one gonna cost. Let everyone get on with their lifes (especially her family) & let her RIP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vResistance Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 So an impact at 65 mph makes no difference to the internal injuries you can suffer if you're not wearing a seatbelt - kinda defies expert testimony... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-492138/Seatbelts-saved-lives-Diana-Dodi.html If Al-Fayed had good reasons to suspect something untoward why didn't he bring evidence to the inquest, in open court, with the worlds press there? What has been covered up about the accident - please explain......... Come on Loncol, an idiot can see there are very suspicious circumstances surrounding her death, stop acting dumb. Maybe you should watch the film. From the link above- "Senior accident investigator Anthony Read said he could "almost guarantee" that the couple would have survived had they been strapped in and travelling at THE SPEED LIMIT when their Mercedes crashed in Paris's Alma tunnel." ...No sh@t Sherlock. Where did you get 65mph from, that's hardly a high speed. Yes the driver would no doubt have a better chance of survival if wearing a seatbelt. Its another matter for a rear seat passenger though, being thrown against the seat would likely cause less injury than a seatbelt, it's the person in front most at danger. Remember the advert? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.