Does anyone else think Hague is a slimy creep?

[choogling]

I was thinking that, he's hardly Lord Snooty, he came from a normal family who worked for their money. I find him one of the more down to earth witty Tories. Slimy to me means people like Mandleson and Redwood.

 

As for him being gay it's just not an issue, has he ever come out with homophobia?

Talking about slimy without mentioning Tony Blair seems odd.

[Supertramp]

Talking about slimy without mentioning Tony Blair seems odd.

 

What about Ed, is he slimy, a creep, or a slimy creep? Can't work it out.

[tinfoilhat]

What about Ed, is he slimy, a creep, or a slimy creep? Can't work it out.

 

Ed milliband will be shortly unveiled as our new WMD. They'll lower him from a drone over Syria and he can launch his death stare. :hihi:

 

http://www.dailysquib.co.uk/world/2730-ed-miliband-to-have-grotesque-stare-surgically-adjusted.html

[NorthernStar]

As for him being gay it's just not an issue, has he ever come out with homophobia?

 

There's nothing wrong with being gay I agree, the real issue is that if it turns out to be true then it shows both cowardice and dishonesty, these are characteristics that are not desirable for someone in his position.

[Mister M]

I was thinking that, he's hardly Lord Snooty, he came from a normal family who worked for their money. I find him one of the more down to earth witty Tories. Slimy to me means people like Mandleson and Redwood.

 

As for him being gay it's just not an issue, has he ever come out with homophobia?

 

I wonder how he voted on legislation to do with equal rights for gays

[SevenRivers]

There's nothing wrong with being gay I agree, the real issue is that if it turns out to be true then it shows both cowardice and dishonesty, these are characteristics that are not desirable for someone in his position.

 

It could only be assumed to be cowardice and dishonest if you consider his sexuality to be anybody else's business, why would you take such an interest in whether a man you don't know inserts his penis in the bottom of another man you don't know either?

[NorthernStar]

It could only be assumed to be cowardice and dishonest if you consider his sexuality to be anybody else's business, why would you take such an interest in whether a man you don't know inserts his penis in the bottom of another man you don't know either?

 

I don't care about his sexuality but I'm sure his wife would have liked to have known before he married her, he pretended to be a man he now appears not to be.

 

It's about his integrity, if he hasn't got the backbone to be himself and chooses to live a lie then his whole character is up for question.

[SevenRivers]

I don't care about his sexuality but I'm sure his wife would have liked to know before he married her, he pretended to be a man he now appears not to be.

 

Ah yes, because gay men are not really "men" are they?

 

It's about his integrity, if he hasn't got the backbone to be himself and chooses to live a lie then his whole character is up for question.

 

All supposition based on unproven rumour, so we've no need to assume any of that until the event.

 

Personally, I think it's irrational homophobia to assume one man cannot be close friends with a homosexual man, without being homosexual himself.

[NorthernStar]

Ah yes, because gay men are not really "men" are they?

 

Is that what Mr. Hague thinks, it certainly isn't what I think.

 

All supposition based on unproven rumour, so we've no need to assume any of that until the event.

 

Personally, I think it's irrational homophobia to assume one man cannot be close friends with a homosexual man, without being homosexual himself.

 

Maybe it is irrational homophobia to assume one man cannot be close friends with a homosexual man, without being homosexual himself.

 

Perhaps Mr. Hague could sue whoever has made the accusations if he feels his character is being unfairly judged.

[catpus]

I was thinking that, he's hardly Lord Snooty, he came from a normal family who worked for their money. I find him one of the more down to earth witty Tories. Slimy to me means people like Mandleson and Redwood.

 

As for him being gay it's just not an issue, has he ever come out with homophobia?

,

Hi Ridgeway

Ooo didn't he do well then.... It would appear that the lower you are born the greater the propensity to be megalomaniacal: see Thatcher. I don't give a damn where he was born or what his sexuality is, the fact is that he is living a lie and is a LIAR. In my opinion, as a said before, an odious war mongering little sleaze ball, who speaks as if he is constipated and is about to be sick, either that or has 'something' stuck up his jacksy. I don't know who is elocution teacher was but I would avoid them..

I abhor homophobic cretins, but even more so I despise LIARS.

Before you have a go at me, my Brother is a homosexual, and I adore him. He is one of the most thoughtful, loving people I have ever met in my life; and I defend his right to be who he is; unlike a lot of heterosexuals I have had the misfortune of working with as clients when I worked for SS.

I agree totally about Mandelson and Redwood.............. Creeps of the highest order.

 

---------- Post added 29-08-2013 at 18:03 ----------

 

The whole point of this thread was to show that Hague is totally dishonest, and self serving and is in the Cabal's pocket.... Is this a man we should trust to make decision for our security if he can be compromised to such a degree.

Nasty, nasty little slime ball.

 

---------- Post added 29-08-2013 at 18:10 ----------

 

Is that what Mr. Hague thinks, it certainly isn't what I think.

 

 

 

Maybe it is irrational homophobia to assume one man cannot be close friends with a homosexual man, without being homosexual himself.

 

Perhaps Hague could sue whoever has made the accusations if he feels his character is being unfairly judged.

 

Perhaps he should.... let's see what comes out of the woodwork then. The News of the World are used to defending themselves and have the photographs and no doubt other things, to back up their assertions?