boyfriday Posted September 3, 2013 Share Posted September 3, 2013 At last somebody who understands what I'm getting at !! Actually being at the trial and reading about it after each day being in the courtroom, I thought I was at two different trials !! I'm not saying Bridger is innocent. He certainly had a hand in it BUT not in the way the prosecution portrayed. I am talking to like minded people who would actually like to know the truth, not swallow the guff the prosecution spouted out ! But you rely on smoke & mirrors by not telling us how you know what the prosecution was spouting was guff and if it was why Bridger's defence didn't challenge it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teenyweeny Posted September 3, 2013 Author Share Posted September 3, 2013 But you rely on smoke & mirrors by not telling us how you know what the prosecution was spouting was guff and if it was why Bridger's defence didn't challenge it. maybe because they were actually there..which leaves me to believe bridgers defence knew he had blown it..and is saving certain things that have been left out in the courtroom for his appeal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redfox Posted September 3, 2013 Share Posted September 3, 2013 The 'guff' was what exactly? Not objected to by the defence and allowed to be admitted in evidence by a judge! If you want to read about a true miscarriage of justice http://www.amazon.co.uk/Innocents-Justice-Failed-Stefan-Molseed/dp/1857024028 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 At last somebody who understands what I'm getting at !! Actually being at the trial and reading about it after each day being in the courtroom, I thought I was at two different trials !! I'm not saying Bridger is innocent. He certainly had a hand in it BUT not in the way the prosecution portrayed. And how did you identify this when the jury apparently didn't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 maybe because they were actually there..which leaves me to believe bridgers defence knew he had blown it..and is saving certain things that have been left out in the courtroom for his appeal. They may well have been at the trial, but unless they actually know what happened to April Jones their 'guff' is as bad as anybody else's. Incidentally Bridger's barrister, Brendan Kelly is an eminent QC and Crown Court Recorder, it's quite likely he would have seen through any spin the prosecution was trying to put on proceedings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RootsBooster Posted September 5, 2013 Share Posted September 5, 2013 In answer to the thread title, yes, of course miscarriages of justice happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidley Posted September 5, 2013 Share Posted September 5, 2013 There has just been another one hasn't their, boy friend and another released from a life sentence for the murder of Rachel Manning,after real murderer is caught by is DNA after ten years. Of course there are miscarriages of justice at the highest level,innocent People convicted of MURDER. The boy friend and the other person was released after an appeal, they served six years of a life sentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teenyweeny Posted September 5, 2013 Author Share Posted September 5, 2013 And how did you identify this when the jury apparently didn't? because those on the jury had to be those that had not read up about the case..they only decided on what the prosecution presented. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnailyBoy Posted September 5, 2013 Share Posted September 5, 2013 because those on the jury had to be those that had not read up about the case..they only decided on what the prosecution presented. And the defence of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teenyweeny Posted September 5, 2013 Author Share Posted September 5, 2013 brandon kelly must have known that bridger was buggered and also may have cannily set aside some defence for a re trial or appeal.in other words he has not yet played a full hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.