Ela James Posted September 3, 2013 Share Posted September 3, 2013 I’ve been reading an article about the conflict in Syria published on the Guardian written by Wadah Khanfar, a former director general of the al-Jazeera TV, and a number of points he made gave me the impression that - and here I really hope I am wrong - the world today is probably not much better than 20 years ago. One would think that a man with his background ( originally from the Middle East ), and with his work experience in international media, he would be very very careful making statements that are easily checked and found wrong/ inaccurate/ or even biased. Here are some of what he wrote - The US has refused to describe the enforced removal and detention of President Morsi as a coup, despite the killing and wounding of thousands of civilian protesters by Egyptian security forces. In my opinion America had to be practical and face the changing reality, Mr Khanfar seems to be too narrow minded. The situation in Egypt is still very delicate, and can quickly become, potentially, extremely dangerous, didn’t he know that? - Syrians want rid of President Assad, but without US bombs Not all Syrians want rid of President Assad. It has become clear that Assad still has enough support to keep him where he is. Sometimes I wish I didn’t waste my time reading stuff written by experts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted September 3, 2013 Share Posted September 3, 2013 Well, an anti US comment coming from a muslim. Whod've thought it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna Glypta Posted September 3, 2013 Share Posted September 3, 2013 Well, an anti US comment coming from a muslim. Whod've thought it? That just about sums it up. Do we take seriously the biased comments of someone who thinks that world events are governed by his chosen space fairy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ela James Posted September 3, 2013 Author Share Posted September 3, 2013 Under the article in the comments section, I found this comment that might explain another point of view: How much did Qatar pay the Guardian to run this propaganda piece. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supertramp Posted September 3, 2013 Share Posted September 3, 2013 Not sure why it's anti US, the first one is slightly. But then the US is providing funding to the Egyptian army who seemed to be killing at will at one point during the pro-Morsi demos. What is anti US about the 2nd statement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vague_Boy Posted September 3, 2013 Share Posted September 3, 2013 Do we take seriously the biased comments of someone who thinks that world events are governed by his chosen space fairy? As opposed to the lies of George ('God told me to end the tyranny in Iraq') Bush regarding WMDs? Or Tony ("Christian battle") Blair? Intriguing that comments only become biased when they are contrary to your own worldview. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harleyman Posted September 3, 2013 Share Posted September 3, 2013 The US is planning to stop all funding to the military. Like Syria the situation in Egypt is largely a no win situation for the west. What's the choice? Support Morsi who might really have an agenda to turn Egypt into an Islamic ruled state intolerant of any other religion or turn his back on the military whose leaders still honour Mubarak's peace accord with Israel. It's a big game of chess with no clear moves in any direction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supertramp Posted September 3, 2013 Share Posted September 3, 2013 The US is planning to stop all funding to the military. Like Syria the situation in Egypt is largely a no win situation for the west. What's the choice? Support Morsi who might really have an agenda to turn Egypt into an Islamic ruled state intolerant of any other religion or turn his back on the military whose leaders still honour Mubarak's peace accord with Israel. It's a big game of chess with no clear moves in any direction It is a bit of a dilemma. But its hard for the US to justify funding a killing machine/military dictatorship whilst implementing 'freedom and democracy' across the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.