Jump to content

SAS 'apologise' to the Princes for Diana's death


Recommended Posts

Yes - read it - MI6 service may have once entertained (and dismissed) the idea of using a strobe gun to distract the driver of Slobdan Milosevic's car (no mention of a small car to knock the car off course or a motorbike and pillion passenger as per your post#50 on this thread).

 

So something never used (presumably because of slim chance of success) now becomes the only way she could have died :hihi::hihi::hihi:

 

And how many witnesses saw a strobe gun being used (nil I think is the answer).

 

And I thought you'd found something revealing :cool:

 

So we now agree that the MI6 do plot to kill important people, they do use the services of the SAS to do it, that a strobe gun does exist, and uses a bright light to distract/blind the driver of cars, causing accidents.

 

That's progress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we now agree that the MI6 do plot to kill important people, they do use the services of the SAS to do it, that a strobe gun does exist, and uses a bright light to distract/blind the driver of cars, causing accidents.

 

 

No we don't agree - did you read posts #88 and #89?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we now agree that the MI6 do plot to kill important people, they do use the services of the SAS to do it, that a strobe gun does exist, and uses a bright light to distract/blind the driver of cars, causing accidents.

 

That's progress.

 

No we don't agree......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you disagree with? Do you think MI6 do not plot to kill important people? Do you think they wouldn't call on certain people in the SAS to do it?

 

In the case of Diana there is no evidence for any plot or evidence for murder.

 

There is plenty evidence for a car travelling too fast with a driver having had a few drinks, a crash and people being killed because they weren't wearing seatbelts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the case of Diana there is no evidence for any plot or evidence for murder.

 

There is plenty evidence for a car travelling too fast with a driver having had a few drinks, a crash and people being killed because they weren't wearing seatbelts.

 

We're going to have to agree to differ, aren't we?

 

But one way or another, the truth will out eventually, it always does, probably when all the participants are dead and can no longer be held accountable.

 

Now, what do you think happened to the Little Princes in the Tower...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're going to have to agree to differ, aren't we?

 

But one way or another, the truth will out eventually, it always does, probably when all the participants are dead and can no longer be held accountable.

 

The evidence from a couple of extensive inquiries and the inquest shows that your "theory" is highly unlikely to come about.

 

The Daily Express will no doubt continue to print more stupid stories to sell to the gullible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're going to have to agree to differ, aren't we?

 

But one way or another, the truth will out eventually, it always does, probably when all the participants are dead and can no longer be held accountable.

 

Now, what do you think happened to the Little Princes in the Tower...?

 

The truth came out years ago, but there is always a fool prepared to lap up any conspiracy theory and no fact however inconvenient to that theory will ever convince them it is wrong.

 

As was asked earlier. How did the murderers persuade the driver to drive at 90 mph on the exact road they needed for the crash to take place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.