Daid Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 There'd be no point to it. As it is, Chavs let their dogs wee and poo everywhere and they don't get fined, or if they get them, they don't pay them. If the fines aren't going to be applied across the board, there's no point. Just like the laws about public drinking in town centres. The name chav gets thrown around heavily on this forum but do you honestly think or believe that this section of society is solely responsible for dog mess lying around all over? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happ Hazzard Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 Solely? No. Disproportinately responsible? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daid Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 Solely? No. Disproportinately responsible? Yes. Fair enough, though my thoughts are that they are disproportionately blamed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southcoast Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 Ban dogs altogether Agreed,they are dirty animals and seem to attack people on a regular basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daid Posted September 25, 2013 Share Posted September 25, 2013 Agreed,they are dirty animals and seem to attack people on a regular basis. So do we but on a much bigger scale. Do you have a cure for that as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRESLEY Posted September 25, 2013 Share Posted September 25, 2013 Some people should be muzzled in public places never mind dogs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willman Posted September 25, 2013 Share Posted September 25, 2013 Solely? No. Disproportinately responsible? Yes. I suppose that depends on location - i can probably count on one hand the number of "chavs" who walk a dog near me. But the dog mess is all around, along with the destruction of field boundaries because they can't be bothered to climb a stile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted September 25, 2013 Share Posted September 25, 2013 There'd be no point to it. As it is, Chavs let their dogs wee and poo everywhere and they don't get fined, or if they get them, they don't pay them. If the fines aren't going to be applied across the board, there's no point. Just like the laws about public drinking in town centres. How do you stop a dog weeing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peewee84 Posted September 25, 2013 Share Posted September 25, 2013 Agreed,they are dirty animals and seem to attack people on a regular basis. Urgh. I think we should ban all humans given they are the most murderous, despicable species. Especially dog haters. Can't imagine they are very nice people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickiethecat Posted September 25, 2013 Share Posted September 25, 2013 I don't think all dogs should be muzzled but I definitely think that the dangerous breeds such as staffies and rottweilers should. Come to think of it, their owners should be muzzled too as the only reason people own staffies is because they want to look hard! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.