frededwards Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 "Mr Adebolajo has asked to be known as Mujaahid Abu Hamza in court, while Mr Adebowale wants to be called Ismail Ibn Abdullah." They should tell them to shut up and refer to them throughout the trial as "Defendant A" and "Defendant B". They shouldn't be on trial anyway, the should be dressed in orange in a Caribbean holiday camp, being water boarded to find out what they know. They should then be "disposed of." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted September 27, 2013 Author Share Posted September 27, 2013 Their argument could be that Gods law supersedes English law. That's fine, they'll go to prison That English soldiers invade the countries of Islam and kill people without being charged with murder. That's fine, they'll go to prison That our laws allow for the freedom of religious expression. They do indeed, but not at the expense of the lives of others. And that there are already precedents set for our laws being changed to accommodate Gods laws...but not right now-Strangeways, solitary confinement and the prison graveyard beckon ---------- Post added 27-09-2013 at 13:00 ---------- "Mr Adebolajo has asked to be known as Mujaahid Abu Hamza in court, while Mr Adebowale wants to be called Ismail Ibn Abdullah." They should tell them to shut up and refer to them throughout the trial as "Defendant A" and "Defendant B". They shouldn't be on trial anyway, the should be dressed in orange in a Caribbean holiday camp, being water boarded to find out what they know. They should then be "disposed of." You don't think they'd LOVE that? Oh political and religious martyrs, they'd be canonised by their acolytes! No, let them see the cold, impartial face of British justice. Allow them all the grandstanding they want..they'll be peeing their pants when they receive whole life tariffs and their media platform is taken away from them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geared Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Take them out the back of the court room, let the members of Lee Rigby's squad put a bullet in them both. Save the taxpayer some money and save his family the trauma of this media circus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angos Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 That's fine, they'll go to prison That's fine, they'll go to prison They do indeed, but not at the expense of the lives of others. ..but not right now-Strangeways, solitary confinement and the prison graveyard beckon Why did you start the thread? because answers like that don't really further the discussion, your original statement was. Will be interesting to hear what their defence is likely to be. Then you don't appear to want to descuss what their defense is likely to be. Clearly they will go to prison, thats a given, but your thread appeared to be soliciting opinions on what their defence will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 They want a courtroom show where they are the stars. The thing is we all know what the ending is going to be so the best thing would be for the media not to give them the publicity they want - just let us know when it is finished. not very often we agree on things lol, but today......spot on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossyrooney Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Take them out the back of the court room, let the members of Lee Rigby's squad put a bullet in them both. Save the taxpayer some money and save his family the trauma of this media circus. Only in this country would they have been allowed to leave the scene without being riddled in bullets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jew Boy Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 You say that as if its a bad thing, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Only in this country would they have been allowed to leave the scene without being riddled in bullets. because we as a nation are civilised, we didn't need to, so we didn't, why stoop to their level of violence, hate and degradation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted September 27, 2013 Author Share Posted September 27, 2013 Clearly they will go to prison, thats a given, but your thread appeared to be soliciting opinions on what their defence will be. The points you raised aren't a 'defence', I was really seeking speculations on their legal defence, assuming they have one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 The points you raised aren't a 'defence', I was really seeking speculations on their legal defence, assuming they have one. I don't suppose "It wasn't me, I didn't do it, I wasn't there" will wash with this one will it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.