SevenRivers Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 all mainstream media is propaganda, if you don't know that , that means its working very effectively on you, A British tabloid using wrong photographs obviously proves beyond doubt the Kenya attack was nothing to do with Muslim terrorists and it was actually the Americans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 A British tabloid using wrong photographs obviously proves beyond doubt the Kenya attack was nothing to do with Muslim terrorists and it was actually the Americans. heh he'll have some weird conspiracy claptrap along those lines yeah or it was really commited by 2 pac, princess diana the loch ness monster and elvis errrrrrrrrrrm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 A British tabloid using wrong photographs obviously proves beyond doubt the Kenya attack was nothing to do with Muslim terrorists and it was actually the Americans. Don't forget the jews. Conspiracy theories should always include jews/Zionists/mossad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinz Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 I take it your one of their many 'non reading readers' skinz Correct...If you mean do I subscribe to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eater Sundae Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Don't forget the jews. Conspiracy theories should always include jews/Zionists/mossad. Well, according to yesterday's papers, Israel knew about it day before it happened, so it must have been them. Simple, innit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dosxuk Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 youtube is alot more reliable than newspapers Yup, a video upload site with no rules or even guidelines about attribution / sourcing / evidence, run by the worlds largest advertising and profiling company, which also happens to be being investigated in several countries for potential antitrust / monopoly abuses, is far more trustworthy and reliable than anything you'll see in a newspaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gleadly Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Looks like the DM have removed the page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightrider Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Under the headline " The executioner. Caught CCTV horrific moment Al Shabaab gunman took deadly aim hostages-Nairobi mall massacre " http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2436704/The-executioner-Caught-CCTV-horrific-moment-Al-Shabaab-gunman-took-deadly-aim-hostages-Nairobi-mall-massacre.html Turns out to be a photograph of an armed robbery taking place in Miami, Florida. The image is even listed on the FBI website. http://www.fbi.gov/miami/press-releases/2010/mm041610a.htm They could give the Sheffield Star a run for it's money in the shoddy, poor, lazy journalism department. Most UK news publications use these kind of tricks. Don't believe what they tell you! ---------- Post added 30-09-2013 at 16:44 ---------- Yup, a video upload site with no rules or even guidelines about attribution / sourcing / evidence, run by the worlds largest advertising and profiling company, which also happens to be being investigated in several countries for potential antitrust / monopoly abuses, is far more trustworthy and reliable than anything you'll see in a newspaper. Obviously youtube is not reliable, anyone can post on it. That does not mean newspapers are not also hoodwinking you to push certain opinions on the public. Though in this case the DM is probably just being lazy to make the story look good (rather than lying about what happened), because they needed a photo and did not have one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinz Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Obviously youtube is not reliable, anyone can post on it. That does not mean newspapers are not also hoodwinking you to push certain opinions on the public. Though in this case the DM is probably just being lazy to make the story look good (rather than lying about what happened), because they needed a photo and did not have one. Nah, I'm quite prepared to be convinced by the lying bit. Bit like a husband lying to his wife about a sleazy affair.."Well I just said I didn't cos I didn't want to hurt your feelings" and until found out I looked good. It's not lazy journalism it's corrupt journalism...clear and simple. The pic would still be up if they hadn't been caught with grubby fingers in the till. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanerothyme Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 youtube is alot more reliable than newspapers With youtube at least, you are confronted by the fact you have to judge provenance yourself, and not abrogate that responsibility to an institution, organization or commercial enterprise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.