Chris_Sleeps Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 No, I think he should have got a longer sentence So what he did was wrong? He shouldn't have done it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bypassblade Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 So you are applauding a violent criminal-you seem rather confused. No I think they are just saying well done to the person that has done it, it should have been his jugular, I mean you're statement seems to be defending a child killer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 hes a kid killer why should he deserve to live :loopy: He's a convicted felon, dealt with by a court of law appointed by the society you and I are both part of. Kangaroo courts dispensing 'justice' and vigilantism don't sit well with me, after all when will you or I (or worse our children) become the victim of one if society tolerates their existence? ---------- Post added 03-10-2013 at 12:34 ---------- Thank goodness convicted murderer and rapist Juvinal Ferreira raped and murdered so he was in a position to inflict minor harm on another. I'm sure the family of Elaine Walpole feel good today. /irony. That's teeth gnashingly spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 I mean you're statement seems to be defending a child killer. Your statement applaudes a rapist and a murderer. Let's not pretend we're on any moral highground here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinz Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 No I think they are just saying well done to the person that has done it, it should have been his jugular, I mean you're statement seems to be defending a child killer. .................................................... Chris got there 1st. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 BOTH are in jail for acts of unspeakable evil, we shouldn't be applauding any of their tit for tat crap, there is no moral ground, both are scum and where they should be, the only reason the perpetrator did it is to get higher up in the prisoner heirachy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james1112 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 I agree with both sides of the coin here, so I agree that they both deserve what happened, but I also agree that 2 wrongs don't make a right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 BOTH are in jail for acts of unspeakable evil, we shouldn't be applauding any of their tit for tat crap, there is no moral ground, both are scum and where they should be, the only reason the perpetrator did it is to get higher up in the prisoner heirachy Well said Mel, that's precisely what I was looking for but couldn't think how to express it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinz Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 They should make em cell buddies and cable-tie their hands and feet. They could kiss n make up or bite each other to death. The winner gets bread wiv no butter and bog water for 10yrs. In solitary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 They should make em cell buddies and cable-tie their hands and feet. They could kiss n make up or bite each other to death. The winner gets bread wiv no butter and bog water for 10yrs. In solitary. You've just described my impoverished home life..but without the butter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.