hackey lad Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Durrrrr. The criticisms were aimed at Ralph Miliband who is dead. Ed can't sue on behalf of a dead person. no need to be rude . it was a honest question ,why not just give an answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happ Hazzard Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Papers have the right to offend and people (including MPs) have the right to be offended. Not can we move on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
algy Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Most frightening is the suggestion that Gove is Cameron's most likely successor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 To me he is the, "Prince Philip," of politics. I bet he has to have an army of apologisers following him around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPC464 Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 Would you say papers shouldn't be allowed to offend? They'd end up publishing nothing but blank pages. Or they could just print actual news and commentary, rather than attacks on people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchemist Posted October 4, 2013 Author Share Posted October 4, 2013 Or they could just print actual news and commentary, rather than attacks on people. newspapers print NEWS????? what ARE you on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 newspapers print NEWS????? what ARE you on? Newspapers don't sell news they pedal opinions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamo Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 Newspapers don't sell news they pedal opinions The only difference between them and us is that people pay to hear their opinions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manlinose Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 Most frightening is the suggestion that Gove is Cameron's most likely successor he has been quoted on numerous occasions as saying that he doesn't want to be leader, has no intention of trying to become leader and, even if he changed his mind, his family and friends would soon change it back for him (or words to that effect) he may have idiotic tendencies, but he isn't stupid - as long as osborne and johnson are around gove has little chance of being the next leader of the conservatives ---------- Post added 04-10-2013 at 10:03 ---------- The only difference between them and us is that people pay to hear their opinions! i pay for the computer and broadband connection that enabled me to read your opinion - money well spent in my view! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 The only difference between them and us is that people pay to hear their opinions! Or people pay to buy their opinions because they're too thick to come up with their own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.