woolyhead Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 What about the idea that before the big bang there was something, let's call it sub space, everywhere. The big bang then put into this space enerergy which condensed into matter which formed galaxies. So C, the speed of light, is 3x10exp8 metres/sec in space but maybe not in sub space. There is a famous experiment in physice called Aspect's experiment, in which, to keep it simple, a property shared by two photons and which, if one photon is disturbed, is transferred from one photon to the other in zero time regardless of the distance between them. Since information can only travel at a max of C, what if it travels in sub space? Do we like this idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADSLASUK Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 I don't know the answer , but I've forwarded the question to Professor Sheldon Cooper and now waiting a reply . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Total Chaos Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Does this include the Higgs Boson theory? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 What about the idea that before the big bang there was something, let's call it sub space, everywhere. The big bang then put into this space enerergy which condensed into matter which formed galaxies. So C, the speed of light, is 3x10exp8 metres/sec in space but maybe not in sub space. There is a famous experiment in physice called Aspect's experiment, in which, to keep it simple, a property shared by two photons and which, if one photon is disturbed, is transferred from one photon to the other in zero time regardless of the distance between them. Since information can only travel at a max of C, what if it travels in sub space? Do we like this idea? Where did this energy come from then? Why can we not see this subspace? You are aware of what the Bell test is meant to demonstrate yes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dosxuk Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 I don't know the answer , but I've forwarded the question to Professor Sheldon Cooper and now waiting a reply . I wish I could be as amusing as you. I've even added you to my list of comedy heroes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vague_Boy Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Why can we not see this subspace? See? With our eyes? Well, why can't we see into the infra red or ultra violet spectrum? If you mean by scientific instruments, well, why couldn't people "see" the Higgs-Boson particle in the 17th century? I mean, it was there. Were they blind or something? Science knows it doesn't know everything; otherwise, it'd stop Dara Ó Briain Just give science time old fruit, give it time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien52 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 What about the idea that before the big bang there was something, let's call it sub space, everywhere. The big bang then put into this space enerergy which condensed into matter which formed galaxies. So C, the speed of light, is 3x10exp8 metres/sec in space but maybe not in sub space. There is a famous experiment in physice called Aspect's experiment, in which, to keep it simple, a property shared by two photons and which, if one photon is disturbed, is transferred from one photon to the other in zero time regardless of the distance between them. Since information can only travel at a max of C, what if it travels in sub space? Do we like this idea? I think you will find that the answer is 42. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angos Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 What about the idea that before the big bang there was something, let's call it sub space, everywhere. The big bang then put into this space enerergy which condensed into matter which formed galaxies. So C, the speed of light, is 3x10exp8 metres/sec in space but maybe not in sub space. There is a famous experiment in physice called Aspect's experiment, in which, to keep it simple, a property shared by two photons and which, if one photon is disturbed, is transferred from one photon to the other in zero time regardless of the distance between them. Since information can only travel at a max of C, what if it travels in sub space? Do we like this idea? Or the universe and normal space existed before the big bang which was just an event in that universe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADSLASUK Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 I wish I could be as amusing as you. I've even added you to my list of comedy heroes. Thank you , who else is on the list ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolyhead Posted October 14, 2013 Author Share Posted October 14, 2013 Or the universe and normal space existed before the big bang which was just an event in that universe. However it doesn't give any idea as to how the entangled pair both change their spin at the same time. ---------- Post added 14-10-2013 at 13:59 ---------- Where did this energy come from then? Why can we not see this subspace? You are aware of what the Bell test is meant to demonstrate yes? Maybe sub space has a vast amount of energy within itself which is prevented from spewing out under normal circumstances. When an instability occurred the energy exploded out of a tiny piece of sub space, hence an expanding energy ball. Maybe the instability was caused by black hole in a previous universe, which became so powerful that it exceeded its enegy density limitation and broke through into our sub space. I think I know about Bell's inequality test but please tell us all. ---------- Post added 14-10-2013 at 14:05 ---------- I think you will find that the answer is 42. It can't be 42 because it factorises. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.