scousemouse Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 geared, I think that loophole was closed some years ago. My uncle was very forward thinking and put the house into his son and daughter names about 30 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLASGOWOODS Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 It'll never work. Anyone with half a brain left will sign their house over to son/daughter and give them their savings. Effectively living in a rented house, with no money and only their pension to survive. I don't think that will work. The bean counters are already aware of this kind of activity and can ( if proven) go to court and get hold of the assets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avidcameron Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 It'll never work. Anyone with half a brain left will sign their house over to son/daughter and give them their savings. Effectively living in a rented house, with no money and only their pension to survive.[/QUOTE] Anyone with more than a brain cell will be more measured.Hardly effective when your offspring invest the money in junk bonds,the property bubble etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 For those with more than £23,250 in savings and a house. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2462024/DAILY-MAIL-COMMENT-Targeting-thrifty-answer.html#ixzz2hrplGrJo The article says "COMMENT" though, is this opinion rather than news? I found this link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2461823/SIMON-HEFFER-This-elderly-care-plan-punish-prudent-favour-feckless.html But reading further in it says: However, this may not now be so. I've highlighted the "may". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poppet2 Posted October 16, 2013 Author Share Posted October 16, 2013 I don't think that will work. The bean counters are already aware of this kind of activity and can ( if proven) go to court and get hold of the assets. This is correct. The Tax man is well aware of these illegal criminal activities of people trying to sign over their assets due to the various property booms over the years, due to sons & daughters fearing they won't get their parents inheritance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janie48 Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 It is all a smoke screen anyhow. I intend to sell my house when I get to 70 and rent a place. I'll pass my cash on to my kids who hopefully will pay my bills as and when that might be required.I note you stated hopefully Sounds like you may be a little doubtful? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geared Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 Trick here is to make sure you bring your kids up correctly I didn't realise the taxmen were already well onto people, wonder if the legislation on it is easy to understand (for the common man). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 It'll never work. Anyone with half a brain left will sign their house over to son/daughter and give them their savings. Effectively living in a rented house, with no money and only their pension to survive. Er, no. Such a Transfer can be easily reversed. Cf similar attempts to defraud creditors: s.339 et seq of the Insolvency Act 1986. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Bourne Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 Er, no. Such a Transfer can be easily reversed. Cf similar attempts to defraud creditors: s.339 et seq of the Insolvency Act 1986. Interesting... would this also apply in other such cases like that BBC paedo Stuart Hall, who transferred his house to his wife before he was sentenced? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 Interesting... would this also apply in other such cases like that BBC paedo Stuart Hall, who transferred his house to his wife before he was sentenced? That depends on: a. whether anyone lost out on its value as a result; and b. the timescale, as any recovery action needs to be within the applicable time period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.