angos Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 You seem really agitated,and now you are shifting the goalposts.I do not think you can adopt a grandchild,unless it happens coincidentally.What or who is agitating your"thought"processes?Are you on some form of stimulant?(sorry to ask) :loopy::loopy::loopy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avidcameron Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 :loopy::loopy::loopy: Just as I anticipated.Words will do next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angos Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 Just as I anticipated.Words will do next time. Your post wasn't worthy of a typed reply this :loopy::loopy::loopy: was all that was necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted October 21, 2013 Share Posted October 21, 2013 You moving the goalposts Mel? Paedophilia? Do you know what paedophilia is or even means? If you want to mess with ages then why not 28-14 or 24-10 or even bolder 65-15 If we educated our children about the realities of sex (at school and at home) instead of relying on a daily diet of easily accessible porn, we may, just may start making inroads. I'm wondering what level of maturity someone the age of 29 is when slipping the panties down of a 15yr old. ---------- Post added 22-10-2013 at 00:18 ---------- Your post wasn't worthy of a typed reply this :loopy::loopy::loopy: was all that was necessary. The fact you are on this thread Smithy is enough to argue against almost anything you say, we all know your stance on the integration of paedophiles within the community over the protection of the victims. Ironically they already are, you wanna rubber stamp it and make paedophilia more "palatable" which plays right into the hands of the paedo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avidcameron Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Your post wasn't worthy of a typed reply this :loopy::loopy::loopy: was all that was necessary. Crumbs........I do not think I can counter this reasoning.Are the turquoise symbols representing your medication? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angos Posted October 22, 2013 Share Posted October 22, 2013 Paedophilia? Do you know what paedophilia is or even means? If you want to mess with ages then why not 28-14 or 24-10 or even bolder 65-15 If we educated our children about the realities of sex (at school and at home) instead of relying on a daily diet of easily accessible porn, we may, just may start making inroads. I'm wondering what level of maturity someone the age of 29 is when slipping the panties down of a 15yr old. ---------- Post added 22-10-2013 at 00:18 ---------- The fact you are on this thread Smithy is enough to argue against almost anything you say, we all know your stance on the integration of paedophiles within the community over the protection of the victims. Ironically they already are, you wanna rubber stamp it and make paedophilia more "palatable" which plays right into the hands of the paedo. And another crawls out of the woodwork. ---------- Post added 22-10-2013 at 07:32 ---------- Crumbs........I do not think I can counter this reasoning.Are the turquoise symbols representing your medication? No they represent your post, which was clearly . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.