Halibut Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 I doubt that it happens often. I guess that it is frequently used as a defence. It would be interesting to be able to find out statistically how likely it is to accidentally acquire such images - anyone else on SF ever come across such stuff by mistake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angos Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Do us all a favour and try to post at least one coherent post per day:rolleyes: Not a lot I can do about my posts if you don't understand them, best if you don't read them if you don't understand them. There is an ignore button just for this purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megalithic Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 It would be interesting to be able to find out statistically how likely it is to accidentally acquire such images - anyone else on SF ever come across such stuff by mistake? Yes, i even asked on here about reporting it. This was from Google, though with safe search off. I really don't want to go into detail about the image though, absolutely awful thing to have in your mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeMac Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Not a lot I can do about my posts if you don't understand them, best if you don't read them if you don't understand them. There is an ignore button just for this purpose. Yes, but it doesn't work on someone who changes their name as often as you do. So, could you try posting in English, please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Yes, i even asked on here about reporting it. This was from Google, though with safe search off. I really don't want to go into detail about the image though, absolutely awful thing to have in your mind. Oh dear, that sounds rough. Anyone else you know ever experienced this? I was going to ask what your search terms were, but actually it's probably not a good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megalithic Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Oh dear, that sounds rough. Anyone else you know ever experienced this? I was going to ask what your search terms were, but actually it's probably not a good idea. It was just a single image i saw during an image search brought up by a very innocuous search term. I was designing flyers for a charity event and needed some small images to decorate the edges of the piece, beach balls, kites etc. It's only happened that once, and i don't know of any other cases thankfully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angos Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Yes, but it doesn't work on someone who changes their name as often as you do. So, could you try posting in English, please Then just don't respond to posts you don't understand, its not rocket science, even a child could manage it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeMac Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 Then just don't respond to posts you don't understand, its not rocket science, even a child could manage it. Do you have anything to add to the debate. It is pretty interesting up there ^^^. Except for your nagging nonsense. Have you tried "I'm Bored"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nagel Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 What surprised me was that they are blocking 100,000 search terms. That seems like an awfully large number, unless they have (say) 50 words and they're counting all the possibilities of how those words could be combined to make a phrase? Did anyone else notice how Cameron slipped in that GCHQ would have their part to play in this. So they soften up the population to universal state surveillance on the back of cracking down on something that everyone objects to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeMac Posted November 18, 2013 Share Posted November 18, 2013 What surprised me was that they are blocking 100,000 search terms. That seems like an awfully large number, unless they have (say) 50 words and they're counting all the possibilities of how those words could be combined to make a phrase? Did anyone else notice how Cameron slipped in that GCHQ would have their part to play in this. So they soften up the population to universal state surveillance on the back of cracking down on something that everyone objects to. I guess that when you include word combinations, misspellings, plurals and the like, you will soon get to 100 000 combinations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.