JFKvsNixon Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 There's nothing to give up on Yet you'd deprive them of a valuable sauce of money because of your hatred of someone, your hatred is clearly more important to you than the children. No. I said that the state should give victims all the help that they need, and that Jimmy Saviles stuff should be destroyed. You asked why should the state help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angos Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 No. I said that the state should give victims all the help that they need, and that Jimmy Saviles stuff should be destroyed. You asked why should the state help. Which just tells me that your feeling towards Jimmy Savile are more important to you, than the well being of the children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Which just tells me that your feeling towards Jimmy Savile are more important to you, than the well being of the children. I said that the state should look after the victims well being, by giving them all the help that they need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angos Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 I said that the state should look after the victims well being, by giving them all the help that they need. You also said you wanted to deprive them of a valuable source of income, because it would make you feel bad knowing were the income had come from, hence youy feeling are more important to you than the well being of the children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 You also said you wanted to deprive them of a valuable source of income, because it would make you feel bad knowing were the income had come from, hence youy feeling are more important to you than the well being of the children. I'll tell you what. You can believe whatever you want to. I've said what I believe about your idea on this page on this thread. We seem to be speaking a different language, so I'll not continue to waste my time. You can get your company elsewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxman Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 I must say I feel a bit...queasy, watching where he's sat next to little girls pretending to be a children's tv presenter. I actually like this song, all their rest were rubbish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epic Fail Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Charity is more important than 'morals'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxman Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Charity is more important than 'morals'. No it isn't. Would it be OK for a paedophile to escape justice if they promised to fund an orphanage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epic Fail Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 No it isn't. Would it be OK for a paedophile to escape justice if they promised to fund an orphanage? Me and you both know that's a terrible analogy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Charity is more important than 'morals'. So you wouldn't mind if I stole from you, to buy food for the starving? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.