SpikeMac Posted November 26, 2013 Share Posted November 26, 2013 Well the article you link to says he did. Snigger. Don't you just love it when that happens. However, I do wish that the press would keep out of these very personal problems. It isn't news. There are much more important things happening in the world that don't get reported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Hardie Posted November 26, 2013 Share Posted November 26, 2013 Well the article you link to says he did. So he donated £6k (probably to get the work) and then charged them £1.5m for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeMac Posted November 26, 2013 Share Posted November 26, 2013 So he donated £6k (probably to get the work) and then charged them £1.5m for it. So, he's a Tory party funder. End of argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Hardie Posted November 26, 2013 Share Posted November 26, 2013 So, he's a Tory party funder. End of argument. Not quite. It was Maurice Saatchi that made the donation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonJeremy Posted November 26, 2013 Share Posted November 26, 2013 Not quite. It was Maurice Saatchi that made the donation. Rofl. Ha. Exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeMac Posted November 26, 2013 Share Posted November 26, 2013 Not quite. It was Maurice Saatchi that made the donation. So, Charles didn't make a £6K donation. And he didn't charge the Tories £1.5M. And we don't know if he's a Tory party donor or not from your link. Still, at least we know that you read David Irving's blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Hardie Posted November 26, 2013 Share Posted November 26, 2013 Still, at least we know that you read David Irving's blog. How do you make that out mate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeMac Posted November 26, 2013 Share Posted November 26, 2013 How do you make that out mate? By reading the link that you posted. I assume that you read it before linking to it. Mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Hardie Posted November 26, 2013 Share Posted November 26, 2013 By reading the link that you posted. I assume that you read it before linking to it. Mate. Yes I read it. And so did you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeMac Posted November 26, 2013 Share Posted November 26, 2013 Yes I read it. And so did you. I read lots of things. In this case, I read a link that you were using to back up your case. Erroneously as it turns out. If I were linking to a site, I'd use something that I considered reliable and credible. You linked to David Irving's blog. Presumably, you considered that this site gave your argument some credibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.