boyfriday Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 yes you are :hihi:Oh yes he is. Oh look the Widow Twankey slapping the arse of the pantomime donkey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricgem2002 Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Oh look the Widow Twankey slapping the arse of the pantomime donkey eeh aww:hihi: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mafya Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 No not really, I just dislike indoctrinated, arrogant apologists for muslim terrorists. When someone gives a possible reason/motive for a terrorist incident it doesn't mean they are an apologist for Muslim terrorists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angos Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 When someone gives a possible reason/motive for a terrorist incident it doesn't mean they are an apologist for Muslim terrorists. Their religion is their motive and you just like to make up excuses for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tzijlstra Posted December 13, 2013 Author Share Posted December 13, 2013 Are you claiming that all Muslims are Islamist terrorists? This is what you said: There isn't a solution that will appease the Islamist that we will be able to live with, so that leaves wiping them out. Islamist refers to people who believe in the islam. You suggest clearly in your post that they all need wiping out. If you didn't than you should be a lot more careful with the wording of your argument. ---------- Post added 13-12-2013 at 21:45 ---------- No not really, I just dislike indoctrinated, arrogant apologists for muslim terrorists. The only indoctrination occurring in this country is the one where the government claims it is doing a good job in Afghanistan just as it was claimed there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. We all know they just went into Iraq because George Bush Jr had been told by Sr. that he was ****** off that he never managed to topple Hussein. Result: 110,000 dead civilians. But you never read about that in the Daily Fail do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angos Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 This is what you said: Islamist refers to people who believe in the islam. You suggest clearly in your post that they all need wiping out. If you didn't than you should be a lot more careful with the wording of your argument. ---------- Post added 13-12-2013 at 21:45 ---------- The only indoctrination occurring in this country is the one where the government claims it is doing a good job in Afghanistan just as it was claimed there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. We all know they just went into Iraq because George Bush Jr had been told by Sr. that he was ****** off that he never managed to topple Hussein. Result: 110,000 dead civilians. But you never read about that in the Daily Fail do you? This is what some Muslims say about it. Is It Islamic or Islamist The left is wrongly defending Islamism—an extremist and at times violent ideology—which it confuses with the common person’s Islam, while the right is often wrongly attacking the Muslim faith, which it confuses with Islamism. Western thinkers must begin to recognize the difference between Islamism and Islam, or we are headed toward an ideologically defined battle with one quarter of humanity. The blurry line between Islam and Islamism We have attempted to placate ourselves, following the savage murder of Drummer Rigby, by deploying a dichotomy: Islam (and ordinary Muslims) versus this thing ‘Islamism’. Islam is a noble and peaceable faith which we must all respect, whereas Islamism is a corrosive and aggressive political ideology, and the two — weirdly — have nothing to do with one another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pritt Stick Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Hi Moz The film is rubbish. Re Western values...... I think two things the Islamists htpate about us are: 1) we live in a society where church and state are separated. The Islamists would have us living in a theocracy where we could be punished for not only breaking the laws of the state but also if we disobeyed religious laws; 2) education of women (see Malala). That's it. Two to be getting on with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mozilla Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Hi Moz The film is rubbish. Re Western values...... I think two things the Islamists htpate about us are: 1) we live in a society where church and state are separated. The Islamists would have us living in a theocracy where we could be punished for not only breaking the laws of the state but also if we disobeyed religious laws; 2) education of women (see Malala). That's it. Two to be getting on with. What film was it? Who exactly are the Islamists ? If you look at Saudi Arabia as your most extreme example. The separation is about class and staying in power. Within the walls of the $300 million palaces its sex, drugs and rocknroll...dont mension the 'gay heaven' openly on the streets Saudi Arabia is built on the American dream...the dream for the few! Half the population cant read or write....there is a reason for this....they sitting on the oil You may live in a society where church and state are separated....but its still run by the Mafia! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pritt Stick Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Film is Pacific Rim - far too noisy for me. There's a post above re Islamist so I won't add to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
percy filth Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Oh look the Widow Twankey slapping the arse of the pantomime donkey You really are a very sad fellow. Laughing at yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.