Qualtrough Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 I'm genuinely surprised reading this thread. The way people change when it comes to these offences. On the Duggan thread Halibut was not happy with a jury of ten who sat for three months. Further analysis was required and questions to be asked. These men are in the dock with nothing proved and he's found them guilty. Haphazard always knew the inner workings of DLT's mind too, amazing, ESP is proven. You saw it here first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epic Fail Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Yes, terribly sorry! I was working on the assumption that users may have a modicum of awareness re topical events. I'll try to 'dumb down' any future contributions. So because you saw something in the news it means that everyone else must have seen it too? Fix up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Today's Metro has a superb headline: http://liberalengland.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/chuckle-brother-thwarted-dlt-sex-attack.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Bourne Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Thank goodness I'm not on the jury. I've never liked Bill Roache since he stood shoulder-to-shoulder in support of that disgraced ex-MP Neil Hamilton. I've always found Mr Roache to be creepy, both on and off screen. And he's a vegetarian too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Chuckle brother upset DLT in sex attack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pessimistic1 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 I wonder how far back the police are going to go. Maybe the police will posthumously put the Prophet Mo and Joseph on trial for grooming and sexual activity with a child.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkey104 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 So because you saw something in the news it means that everyone else must have seen it too? ---------- Post added 15-01-2014 at 10:04 ---------- Yes, terribly sorry! I was working on the assumption that users may have a modicum of awareness re topical events. I'll try to 'dumb down' any future contributions. Some of us knew what you meant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pessimistic1 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Thank goodness I'm not on the jury. I've never liked Bill Roache since he stood shoulder-to-shoulder in support of that disgraced ex-MP Neil Hamilton. I've always found Mr Roache to be creepy, both on and off screen. And he's a vegetarian too Don't you secret agents have any brains. Because someone sided with someone you don't like shouldn't make it difficult to give someone a fair trial. I fear for our safety when Dr Evil tries to take over the world again with "Special" Agents like you about... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 I wonder how far back the police are going to go. Maybe the police will posthumously put the Prophet Mo and Joseph on trial for grooming and sexual activity with a child.. For as long as it deflects attention away from people struggling to make ends meet in today's society Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qualtrough Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 For as long as it deflects attention away from people struggling to make ends meet in today's society So you think it's a conspiracy by the government to distract attention from austerity? Cameron instructing the police? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.