Halibut Posted January 23, 2014 Author Share Posted January 23, 2014 One of their representatives hasn't said being gay make it rain. Is that really the best retort you can muster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivanava Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 Is that really the best retort you can muster? Nothing other than facts were necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dosxuk Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 One of their representatives hasn't said being gay make it rain. Let me guess, he's not a representative because even though he's a member of the party, he's not representing them and his views are separate from the party's? Or is it that he said gay marriage causes floods rather than being gay makes it rain[/i]? Either way, you're playing with semantics, as per normal, if you have an actual point, please make it, or just go back to the mudslinging script. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oooo Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 Let me guess, he's not a representative because even though he's a member of the party, he's not representing them and his views are separate from the party's? Or is it that he said gay marriage causes floods rather than being gay makes it rain[/i]? Either way, you're playing with semantics, as per normal, if you have an actual point, please make it, or just go back to the mudslinging script. Mudslinging is my word today. Please choose another metaphor of your own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivanava Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 Let me guess, he's not a representative because even though he's a member of the party, he's not representing them and his views are separate from the party's? No he just didn't say what you are claiming he said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dosxuk Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 No he just didn't say what you are claiming he said. Really? Then why did he get the sack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeMaquis Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 No he just didn't say what you are claiming he said. What he wrote was "The scriptures make it abundantly clear that a Christian nation that abandons its faith and acts contrary to the Gospel (and in naked breach of a coronation oath) will be beset by natural disasters such as storms, disease, pestilence and war." Nutcase. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25802437 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivanava Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 Really? Then why did he get the sack? Because he defied a request not to do further media interviews. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dosxuk Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 And why was he told not to do further media interviews? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivanava Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 And why was he told not to do further media interviews? Probably because he doesn't speak for UKIP, his beliefs are his beliefs and not UKIP's beliefs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.