Jump to content

Sun page 3 girls.


was tuesdays page 3 girl tasty?  

31 members have voted

  1. 1. was tuesdays page 3 girl tasty?

    • yes, let's have more like her.
    • no, i prefer a centre spread of jordan!
    • dont know, i missed it.
    • i read another paper showing politicians as tits!
    • i'm not interested in the female form because.......
      0
    • no, you are just a perv.


Recommended Posts

For goodness sake, please don't feed the mucky one.

 

I very much doubt that his "wife" would allow him to read the Sun anyway. He seems like a chap who is a bit repressed.

 

actually, its my wife who buys the sun. she will bring it home from work and finish reading it, often completing the crossword and other puzzles without my help. when i get a paper it is usually the mail or express. the express seems to be running out of news but often prints news of the latest medical developments which i find interesting. sadly, i am usually up to date with this stuff after reading my new scientist magazine so i opt for the mail. i buy about one newspaper per month as the sun can condense into one paragraph what takes up half a page in the mail. i have often bought the mail and never read it as i am often occupied with other things, plus it takes up most of my day just reading it. page 3 is about the nearest i get to seeing any porno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually, its my wife who buys the sun. she will bring it home from work and finish reading it, often completing the crossword and other puzzles without my help. when i get a paper it is usually the mail or express. the express seems to be running out of news but often prints news of the latest medical developments which i find interesting. sadly, i am usually up to date with this stuff after reading my new scientist magazine so i opt for the mail. i buy about one newspaper per month as the sun can condense into one paragraph what takes up half a page in the mail. i have often bought the mail and never read it as i am often occupied with other things, plus it takes up most of my day just reading it. page 3 is about the nearest i get to seeing any porno.

 

Like I said, you seem a bit repressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously, what do you want plumbers and brickies etc to read on their dinner breaks, the Financial Times??

 

In your "bricky" world there's The Sun or The Financial Times? Not much of a stretch of the imagination there Mr H..by a long stretch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 20 years time people will find it really weird that in NEWSpapers they published pictures of women with they breasts out.

 

I find it weird now, it's so stupid. Imagine if Newsnight started with Jeremy Paxman saying "Hello welcome to the show. Look at the norks on this one..........now, a suicide blast in Kabul has killed.."

 

That's exactly how I see page 3, it doesn't make sense. I'm a 23 year old guy with a perfectly normal outlook on women, and I'd feel embarrassed looking at page 3 in public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 20 years time people will find it really weird that in NEWSpapers they published pictures of women with they breasts out.

 

I find it weird now, it's so stupid. Imagine if Newsnight started with Jeremy Paxman saying "Hello welcome to the show. Look at the norks on this one..........now, a suicide blast in Kabul has killed.."

 

That's exactly how I see page 3, it doesn't make sense.

 

Surely he'd say "Gotcha" or "It's Paddy Pantsdown" first:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to admit I saw yesterday's page 3 while waiting in the cafe for my bacon and sausage butty. Normally I wouldn't even register the contents of that page at all but I couldn't help but notice. And yes I agree with the OP's sentiments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't use The Sun as toilet paper. Having said that, I don't understand all the fuss about it printing topless girls on page 3. It's been using this technique for over 40 years and it still appeals to it's demographic.

 

Personally, I don't mind the concept.

 

 

By the way..................Has anyone got a link to the picture? I don't read The Sun but wouldn't mind seeing the girl in question. Purely so I can cast a valid vote on this thread.

 

---------- Post added 13-02-2014 at 09:15 ----------

 

I can't believe 3 people have called you a perv............perv? For looking at page 3 girls?!

 

I don't know what that makes me then!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Page 3 girls are attractive and healthy looking, and the image is not really sexualised at all. Far more acceptable IMO than many other images of emaciated "supermodels" and of women in sexually provocative poses that grace the pages of so-called more "respectable" newspapers.

 

They are not sexualised! I'm not even attracted to women, and even I can see that they are sexualised.

I think this is your crude attempt to highlight division between the Sun, and other more "respectable" newspapers.

And I don't even know how you've got the nerve to complain about women in sexually provocative poses, when your avatar says 'Spunky Monkey'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.