Jump to content

Should a couple on £300k be eligible for Govt. subsidised childcare?


Recommended Posts

why should high earners subsidise scroungers ??

 

You have it the wrong way round, it's the poor that is going to subsidise the rich.

Giving up to £2,000 to a family with two working parents for child care - No Way - Another reason not to vote Tory, and as Labour said it was "To little to late" I shall not be voting for them either. UKIP here we come.

 

Are there food banks in this country, are library's closing, are pensioners being penalised - I could swear, you had the kids, stay home and look after them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have it the wrong way round, it's the poor that is going to subsidise the rich.

Giving up to £2,000 to a family with two working parents for child care - No Way - Another reason not to vote Tory, and as Labour said it was "To little to late" I shall not be voting for them either. UKIP here we come.

 

Are there food banks in this country, are library's closing, are pensioners being penalised - I could swear, you had the kids, stay home and look after them.

 

How are the poor subsidising a couple on 300k? Doesnt their large tax contribution mean anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Government have announced plans to provide a subsidy for childcare for families where both parents go out to work, providing neither parent earns over £150,000.

 

Isn't that earnings threshold a bit high? Surely if both parents are on £150,000 they really don't need help with childcare.

 

Why the hell should other taxpayers subsidise a couple earning £300,000 to get an au pair?

 

The threshold should be much lower.

 

Many families need both parents to work to make ends meet so the subsidy should be targeted at them, not given willy nilly to those who need it as well as those who don't.

 

If the Government didn't fleece everyone for so much tax then families wouldn't need both parents to work to make ends meet and there would be no need for people to pay for child care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How are the poor subsidising a couple on 300k? Doesnt their large tax contribution mean anything?

 

Perhaps it would if they actually paid their dues. Most people earning that kind of money are probably self-employed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps it would if they actually paid their dues. Most people earning that kind of money are probably self-employed.

 

At least being self employed gives people the opportunity to be a little creative with the books . Why pay more in tax than you can get away with paying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least being self employed gives people the opportunity to be a little creative with the books . Why pay more in tax than you can get away with paying.

 

Why moan when they get sent to prision?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps it would if they actually paid their dues. Most people earning that kind of money are probably self-employed.

 

You mean people that actually get up and work hard for themselves ?? better themselves and make a better life for them and their families... work 6/7 days a week.. is that what you mean.. dont be jealous matey, have a go yourself..;) why should it always be the low achievers that get all the hand outs..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.