El Cid Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 Daniel Kahneman got his Nobel prize for his book about the cognitive biases that we all have. I would really like to find the time to read his book, thinking fast and slow. How do we get our many biases? What are youirs, anyone recomend the book? http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/video/2011/nov/21/daniel-kahneman-psychology-video Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivanava Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 This looks an interesting subject. Many conflicts on SF are due to cognitive biases preventing people from coming to the same conclusions with the same evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 I've not heard of Kahneman, but I have heard about cognitive biases. I'd always assumed that it was the psychologist Aaron Beck who first explained the idea of cognitive biases (or limitations in our thinking). Apparently Kahneman was awarded his nobel prize for his work in the field of Economics. I can't reccommend the book as I haven't read it. A bias of my own that stands out, is my uncanny ability to remember the bad things in life that have happened to me rather than the good things. I suspect this is due to the fact that I'm a 'glass half empty, than glass half full' person. There was a Horizon programme about this earlier in the year http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03wyr3c Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cid Posted May 13, 2014 Author Share Posted May 13, 2014 A bias of my own that stands out, is my uncanny ability to remember the bad things in life that have happened to me rather than the good things. I suspect this is due to the fact that I'm a 'glass half empty, than glass half full' person. Not sure if our own biases, are cognitive; but I believe very much in nature. I add meat to my dogs food because they are similar to wolves, our own diet should be the same as it was 500 years ago because I believe that our bodies cannot change in such a short time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 I've read half of his book but wasn't in the mood to finish it. It's certainly interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 Not sure if our own biases, are cognitive; but I believe very much in nature. I add meat to my dogs food because they are similar to wolves, our own diet should be the same as it was 500 years ago because I believe that our bodies cannot change in such a short time. How is that related to the topic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hyper Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 I'm not sure what it's all about, but isn't it something to do with attitude to risk taking with money ?? if anyone can sum it up in 2 or 3 sentences (is that possible?) it would be helpful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinz Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 I'm not sure what it's all about, but isn't it something to do with attitude to risk taking with money ?? if anyone can sum it up in 2 or 3 sentences (is that possible?) it would be helpful. The way I read it is irrationality versus rationality as a base. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cid Posted May 14, 2014 Author Share Posted May 14, 2014 How is that related to the topic? The way I read it is irrationality versus rationality as a base. I havnt read the book yet; but surely no one means to be irrational. Its about inbuilt things that we have learnt that stop us from being rational? I believe in climate change, because that is what the experts say, despite some wealthy people trying to muddy the waters. Some that are not aware of the facts can come to a different conclusion, but so can knowledgable people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivanava Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 I havnt read the book yet; but surely no one means to be irrational. Its about inbuilt things that we have learnt that stop us from being rational? I believe in climate change, because that is what the experts say, despite some wealthy people trying to muddy the waters. Some that are not aware of the facts can come to a different conclusion, but so can knowledgable people. Cognitive bias doesn't need them to be unaware of the facts to come a different conclusion, two people can read the same information yet come to an entirely different conclusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.