Jump to content

The Labour Party. All discussion here please

mort
 Share
Vaati
Message added by Vaati

This is the final warning we are going to give about bickering, name calling etc. If a post breaks the forum rules, report it. Any further and accounts will be suspended.

Recommended Posts

Santo

Santo

Posted
Posted (edited)
Yes. England is not the UK. It's just one part of its four constituent parts.

 

Yeah but he mentioned the rise of nationalist parties in the same post which you removed. So there was no error. Poor form to remove a chunk of post and then ambiguously ask about an error in the remainder. Is that not against the rules?

 

---------- Post added 28-09-2016 at 17:10 ----------

 

Politics has got very strange again. It looks like at the election for the two main parties the choice is going to be between hard left and hard right. Ukip is obsolete. Nationalists have captured Scotland and have a good chance of driving forward in Wales. A new party needs to come onto the scene to represent the centre ground in England.

 

See Jeffrey.

Edited by Santo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Robin-H Rising Star

Robin-H

Posted
Posted
But back on topic: UKIP's rise (and steady, undiminished level of electoral support) bodes ill for Labour MPs, esp. those who are not so enamoured of their re-elected leader.

 

Corbyn saying he sees no problem with mass immigration is unlikely to win many of them back..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Santo

Santo

Posted
Posted
But back on topic: UKIP's rise (and steady, undiminished level of electoral support) bodes ill for Labour MPs, esp. those who are not so enamoured of their re-elected leader.

 

No apology or explanation for snipping a post and then questioning its validity?

 

---------- Post added 28-09-2016 at 17:19 ----------

 

Corbyn saying he sees no problem with mass immigration is unlikely to win many of them back..

 

Totally agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hackey lad Mentor

hackey lad

Posted
Posted
Sorry, but you are wrong unbeliever, the poor are not better off than they were in 1981, if that were the case, why are there many many more people now having to go to the food banks to survive? one million?

and people do mind the rich fleecing us, but they never had a voice, and now they have a voice, Corbyn has given people that voice, the Labour Party has just about trebled its membership...yeah, i know you will say its just the faithful lefties and such, and we are never going to agree on that....but the storm is coming, the media will tell you Corbyn is unelectable, but people are seeing through the media lies

 

sorry to jump in on this but do you really believe that these 1 million people who use foodbanks would actually starve to death on the streets of Britain if foodbanks did not exist ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
banjodeano Proficient

banjodeano

Posted
Posted
sorry to jump in on this but do you really believe that these 1 million people who use foodbanks would actually starve to death on the streets of Britain if foodbanks did not exist ?

i would imagine some of them would, or at least become seriously malnourished...or do you think that the food banks are not needed

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.