Jump to content

The Labour Party. All discussion here please


Message added by Vaati

This is the final warning we are going to give about bickering, name calling etc. If a post breaks the forum rules, report it. Any further and accounts will be suspended.

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Hotmale 1954 said:

They never say for instance 'we have millions working only 20 hours a week on 50p more than the minimum wage'

The millions who would probably be better off not working. 

Although employment is going up, tax revenue is not going up by anything like the same rate because so many of these 'new jobs' either pay so little or have such few hours that employees are inside the allowance or are so poorly paid that employees are in receipt of tax credits.

 

We are basically subsidising low pay employers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said:

Although employment is going up, tax revenue is not going up by anything like the same rate because so many of these 'new jobs' either pay so little or have such few hours that employees are inside the allowance or are so poorly paid that employees are in receipt of tax credits.

 

We are basically subsidising low pay employers.

How is being paid 50p over NMW 'subsidising a low pay employers' ? Have you got experience of running a business? What do you propose NMW and tax threshold to be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ricgem2002 said:

can you elaborate more ?

I'm not sure how the EU makes our government subsidise big business, and our government is completely helpless to stop it.

 

Perhaps you could point me to some specific EU directives or something. I always thought things like tax credits was down to our government. Hope you can show me how it isn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Top Cats Hat said:

Although employment is going up, tax revenue is not going up by anything like the same rate because so many of these 'new jobs' either pay so little or have such few hours that employees are inside the allowance or are so poorly paid that employees are in receipt of tax credits.

 

We are basically subsidising low pay employers.

Are you suggesting that the tax credits system artificially keeps wages low?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, the_bloke said:

Are you suggesting that the tax credits system artificially keeps wages low?

Honestly, yes. Sort of.

 

If I'm asda, why should I pay more to my workers when I can get away paying them less because the state will top up their wages and money for rent? Small businesses would struggle to keep up though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, woodview said:

How is being paid 50p over NMW 'subsidising a low pay employers' ? Have you got experience of running a business? What do you propose NMW and tax threshold to be?

Any business which pays a wage which makes the employee eligible for tax credits is being subsidised by the taxpayer.

 

No, I don't have any experience of running a business but I do employ people all the time. I work in an industry where the people I need are highly skilled so the wages I pay put all my freelancers in the higher rate tax bracket so no real experience of having to pay low wages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said:

Any business which pays a wage which makes the employee eligible for tax credits is being subsidised by the taxpayer.

 

No, I don't have any experience of running a business but I do employ people all the time. I work in an industry where the people I need are highly skilled so the wages I pay put all my freelancers in the higher rate tax bracket so no real experience of having to pay low wages.

So, what's the answer? If nmw keeps going up, lots of those people won't be employed at all as it stands now. Also, you do fully support a system that ensures a vast supply of labour that will work at nmw. If labour supply was more limited then supply and demand would cause low wages to rise. You might realise being in a high earning industry, that those pay rates are partly due to limited supply of suitably skilled staff. If your role had a large supply of available labour, your rates would fall.

In principle though, I do agree wages need to rise across the board, and critically productivity rises, so more and more people come off benefits and into taxable wages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.