Clown Shoes Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 Vanessa Feltz has hit back at "vile" trolls who attacked her for publicly claiming that she had been indecently assaulted by Rolf Harris while interviewing him live on TV. I have 2 questions..... Has she now reported the crime to the police? And has she been paid by the press for the story of this allegation? If she/will has gained financially then i have no sympathy if she gets a negative reaction from the public. She makes her money from appearing in gossip columns, cheap celebrity magazines and tv programs like Big Brother that dissects the lives of others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poppet2 Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 The answer to the first question is YES. The answer to the second question is NO. Thread closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alternageek Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 According to the Express article here she didnt report it herself, but she believes producers and upper managements brought it to project Yewtrees attention. She confirmed what had happened to her As per the article: The star, who has neither sought nor received money for this interview, said that if needed she was prepared to give evidence in future proceedings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickiethecat Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 I see one of the Nolan sisters has also suddenly remembered she was attacked by Rolf Harris the minute there was a chance of a bit of publicity and cash. You can understand ordinary people keeping quiet for fear of not being believed but surely a TV presenter should have said something if it was happening in full view of the camera? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geared Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 She claims it was done on LIVE telly. I assume then all of this will be on camera for everyone to see?? Most TV sets operate multiple camera's covering a variety of angles and shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ukdobby Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 Have said before she wanted to tell him to f--- off but dare not say anything as the cameras was on her,then why didn't she sort him out after the cameras had stopped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dosxuk Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 She claims it was done on LIVE telly. I assume then all of this will be on camera for everyone to see?? Most TV sets operate multiple camera's covering a variety of angles and shots. They aren't normally archived though. Likewise with rehearsals / advert break gaps - normally only the PasB (Programme as Broadcast) copy of live shows is kept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boothybabe Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 Seems like a perfect opportunity for fading no mark celebs to get some free publicity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bypassblade Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 She has made a complaint and apparently so has Linda Nolan, at first it looks a bit opportunistic but if not the truth, what do they have to gain? other than making themselves look really silly. If a complaint is made it has to be looked into, no matter who they are if true then he needs prosecuting if, they are fibbing they would be dealt with appropriately for wasting police time. Since Savile this seems to have opened an enormous can of worms, and it doesn't look like stopping any time soon, if they've done it doesn't matter what age they are get them prosecuted & if convicted banged up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clown Shoes Posted July 7, 2014 Author Share Posted July 7, 2014 She has made a complaint and apparently so has Linda Nolan, at first it looks a bit opportunistic but if not the truth, what do they have to gain? other than making themselves look really silly. If a complaint is made it has to be looked into, no matter who they are if true then he needs prosecuting if, they are fibbing they would be dealt with appropriately for wasting police time. Since Savile this seems to have opened an enormous can of worms, and it doesn't look like stopping any time soon, if they've done it doesn't matter what age they are get them prosecuted & if convicted banged up. No Way. These people have publicist. This is very well timed. She didnt make the accusation when he was arrested or during the trial. If she had made the accusation and Harris was found innocent then she wouldve been in very precarious position in the media. But she waited till he was found guilty to say "oh yeah, he touched me up to" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.