rickiethecat Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 Why didn't she come forward before the trial. It does come across as waiting for the verdict in order to get a free hit. "When's the new book/DVD/TV show out, Vanessa?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 No one has mentioned Nolan cause she doesnt make a living from media explotation. Give over will you, Nolan isn't attacked because she isn't fat, according to matty and co. It takes someone even more depraved and perverted like Harris to even consider Feltz as a would be victim. It's a bit like the misogynists saying "Feltz touched up by Rolf? In her dreams". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poppet2 Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 Why didn't she come forward before the trial. It does come across as waiting for the verdict in order to get a free hit. She did. That's why the Police contacted her after all these years, since she originally reported it. No difference from all those victims who were pushed aside during the Saville scandal. When the police finally did decide to do something about it, prior to the Harris court case, guess what? They couldn't get their act together in time for the court case. Haven't you listen to her comments in her own words in the link provided earlier in this thread #14? No thought not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alternageek Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 Why didn't she come forward before the trial. It does come across as waiting for the verdict in order to get a free hit. See my first post for the link to her interview in the Express from Sunday. Due to the details of the case, she may not have legally been allowed to discuss her assault. The law is bit annoying like that. She never reported it herself, former colleagues forwarded on the information to the police, along with a copy of the interview. Like most victims of sexual assault, she couldnt believe it had happened to her and felt she had dealt with what had happened. She didnt want to reopen old wounds. The police did review the evidence handed over and confirmed her side of the story, though it wasnt used as evidence in his trial - nor was he prosecuted for his attack on her Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minimo Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 So the question is why wasn't he prosecuted for the attack on her? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mort Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 Anybody else who feels it's appropriate to make 'jokes' about a sexual assault will find themselves explaining their attitude at the helpdesk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 I read this morning he stuck his hands down her knickers while his wife was in the same room Oo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickiethecat Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 Has it occurred to Feltz that if she'd reported this alleged attack in 1996 then it might have prevented Rolf Harris from going on to abuse other girls? By not using her powerful media position to expose him she's effectively been complicit in the whole affair and should be ashamed of herself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 Has it occurred to Feltz that if she'd reported this alleged attack in 1996 then it might have prevented Rolf Harris from going on to abuse other girls? By not using her powerful media position to expose him she's effectively been complicit in the whole affair and should be ashamed of herself. and has it occurred to you that its deeply personal and hard to talk about? even think about? nope, thought not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickiethecat Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 and has it occurred to you that its deeply personal and hard to talk about? even think about? nope, thought not Why would it be if, as she claimed, it happened on live television in full view of the cameras? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.