Jump to content

Once more Sheffield's Graves Park is used as a council tip.


Is it acceptable for the council to use parkland as a tipping ground.  

154 members have voted

  1. 1. Is it acceptable for the council to use parkland as a tipping ground.

    • Yes I have no problem with part of Graves Park being used as a tip
      6
    • No. The land should not be used for this storing this filth.
      57
    • The land should be cleared up and restored as public parkland.
      90
    • Who cares as long as it’s not in a park near me.
      1


Recommended Posts

I suppose everyone else who disapproves of what the council is doing is a NIMBY as well? Even when it's not their backyard?

 

As for who should pay, well ultimately, that's us, out of our tax. But someone else should also pay, and that's the person that authorised it, with their job.

Agree fully :thumbsup:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You see, Cyclone, there is one thing that has hampered this discussion throughout - Exaggeration.

The "mountains of poo" are simply a few bags, probably less than could be collected from the park on any given day. The "foul stench" simply doesn't exist. Now you want someone to lose their job because of this storm in a teacup. I hope you have simply been blinded by the lies and exaggeration, but I suspect that you may just be posting to get a reaction. If so, please don't.

This whole thing actually is happening "in my back yard". I live on the edge of the park and paid a couple of hundred thousand for the privilege. If I can put up with this "outrage", I'm sure everyone else can.

Time to move on. End of chat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You see, Cyclone, there is one thing that has hampered this discussion throughout - Exaggeration.

The "mountains of poo" are simply a few bags, probably less than could be collected from the park on any given day. The "foul stench" simply doesn't exist. Now you want someone to lose their job because of this storm in a teacup. I hope you have simply been blinded by the lies and exaggeration, but I suspect that you may just be posting to get a reaction. If so, please don't.

This whole thing actually is happening "in my back yard". I live on the edge of the park and paid a couple of hundred thousand for the privilege. If I can put up with this "outrage", I'm sure everyone else can.

Time to move on. End of chat.

 

So the photographic evidence of misuse & dereliction is a mirage???:loopy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose everyone else who disapproves of what the council is doing is a NIMBY as well? Even when it's not their backyard?

 

As for who should pay, well ultimately, that's us, out of our tax. But someone else should also pay, and that's the person that authorised it, with their job.

 

Well done Cyclone and I thought I was trying to be the voice of reason.

Can I suggest that once the miscreant has been found and the Friends of Graves Park have found them guilty there should be a public humiliation in the park.

The guilty party, he or she, should be formally cashiered, they, their partner and children smeared with freshly gathered dog poo and whipped out of the city to permanent exile over the border in nearby Derbyshire. Any pension entitlement should be forfeited and used to help to pay to remove the unsightly over 50 year old council depot in the park therefore improving the lives of the residents of Norton Park View.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You see, Cyclone, there is one thing that has hampered this discussion throughout - Exaggeration.

The "mountains of poo" are simply a few bags, probably less than could be collected from the park on any given day. The "foul stench" simply doesn't exist. Now you want someone to lose their job because of this storm in a teacup. I hope you have simply been blinded by the lies and exaggeration, but I suspect that you may just be posting to get a reaction. If so, please don't.

This whole thing actually is happening "in my back yard". I live on the edge of the park and paid a couple of hundred thousand for the privilege. If I can put up with this "outrage", I'm sure everyone else can.

Time to move on. End of chat.

 

Chat ends when people stop chatting dude- not when you decree it :)

 

Even if it was only a few bags (sounds like it was way more), fact remains it's illegal fly tipping by the council. The same council that relentlessly prosecutes any citizen for so minor a transgression as dropping a cigarette butt on the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You see, Cyclone, there is one thing that has hampered this discussion throughout - Exaggeration.

The "mountains of poo" are simply a few bags, probably less than could be collected from the park on any given day. The "foul stench" simply doesn't exist. Now you want someone to lose their job because of this storm in a teacup. I hope you have simply been blinded by the lies and exaggeration, but I suspect that you may just be posting to get a reaction. If so, please don't.

This whole thing actually is happening "in my back yard". I live on the edge of the park and paid a couple of hundred thousand for the privilege. If I can put up with this "outrage", I'm sure everyone else can.

Time to move on. End of chat.

 

We've all seen the photos.

Exaggeration or not, the council is misusing land it has no right to.

 

Why would I be posting to get a reaction, the vast majority of posters to this thread already agree, the only reaction I'm likely to get is from you and Blackbeard who appear to be apologists for the council.

 

You're welcome to move on of course, of you go.

 

---------- Post added 23-07-2014 at 10:57 ----------

 

Well done Cyclone and I thought I was trying to be the voice of reason.

Can I suggest that once the miscreant has been found and the Friends of Graves Park have found them guilty there should be a public humiliation in the park.

The guilty party, he or she, should be formally cashiered, they, their partner and children smeared with freshly gathered dog poo and whipped out of the city to permanent exile over the border in nearby Derbyshire. Any pension entitlement should be forfeited and used to help to pay to remove the unsightly over 50 year old council depot in the park therefore improving the lives of the residents of Norton Park View.

 

No, I think sacking them is probably sufficient.

 

---------- Post added 23-07-2014 at 10:58 ----------

 

A polite, concise, informative post - a refreshing change to the rude tripe I have witnessed being flung in your direction, Blackbeard.

 

You never did detail what "rude tripe" had been "flung" at Blackbeard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I want to side against the council, that photo doesn't look like just dog waste.

 

I don't think anyone ever claimed it was "just" dog waste did they? It's definitely waste and it's definitely been tipped where it shouldn't be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.