Jump to content

British Bill of Rights - what do you want in it


Recommended Posts

The same comment is valid as regards any other non-EU agreements, e.g. the European Patent Convention and, still more supranationally, WTO agreements such as TRIPS (simple examples, there are dozens and dozens more).

 

Like it or loathe it, the UK does not live in a planetary vacuum and international relations, be they European (within the 'EU' sense of the word) or well beyond, require codification in one form or another, under which disputes will arise and be arbitrated (whether by the ECHR, or one of the very many international tribunals/courts based in The Hague), so all members keep playing from substantially the same hymn sheet.

 

The alternative, obviously enough, is quasi-anarchy.

 

Can you explain a bit more about the sort of quasi-anarchy that would ensue if the UK decides to not abide by HR laws that protect foreign criminals and extremists from deportation? I'm pretty sure it would not make trading with our European partners any more complicated or damage trading relations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you explain a bit more about the sort of quasi-anarchy that would ensue if the UK decides to not abide by HR laws that protect foreign criminals and extremists from deportation? I'm pretty sure it would not make trading with our European partners any more complicated or damage trading relations.
Nice bit of disingenuousness, there, Zamo.

 

Might wash with other posters (I hope not), doesn't with me.

 

Try again, please :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice bit of disingenuousness, there, Zamo.

 

Might wash with other posters (I hope not), doesn't with me.

 

Try again, please :)

 

How is it disingenuous? :huh:

 

The Tories are talking about withdrawing from the ECHR and creating a British Bill of Rights. If we did that then how would it damage our trading relations? How is it going to cause quasi-anarchy if different members of an economic union apply slightly different interpretations on human rights? Are fellow Member States going to seek the UK's expulsion from the club if we, for example, deport an extremist to Jordan because we interpret a 'right to a family life' as not stopping his family from following him there if they want to?

 

It is a genuine question... what is the problem?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is it disingenuous? :huh:
By taking the expression outside its context, as you did :|

 

"Quasi-anarchy" is the alternative to the "codification of international relations" (of which the UK's membership of the ECHR is a tiny aspect).

 

My post is clear, but you sought to build a strawman by misrepresenting my post with taking the expression out of its context.

It is a genuine question... what is the problem?
Is it now? That would make you either obtuse or disingenuous...so which is it?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you serious?

 

That example is so far removed from the subject we were talking about as to be ludicrous.

 

Let me repeat myself as you don't seem to understand a very simple point.

 

The crime that they were accused of would not have resulted in a jail sentence under British Law.

 

Do you understand that now?

 

The crime of chopping someones head off in an Islamic state run by IS would not result in a jail sentence under their Law, so it must follow that you don't think they should be punished using British law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The crime of chopping someones head off in an Islamic state run by IS would not result in a jail sentence under their Law, so it must follow that you don't think they should be punished using British law.

 

Clutching at straws aren't you!

 

Have you any thoughts on the news today that Cameron's surveillance watchdog has ordered police forces across the country to disclose full details about their use of anti-terror laws to spy on journalists?

 

Do you still have total trust?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By taking the expression outside its context, as you did :|

 

"Quasi-anarchy" is the alternative to the "codification of international relations" (of which the UK's membership of the ECHR is a tiny aspect).

 

My post is clear, but you sought to build a strawman by misrepresenting my post with taking the expression out of its context.

 

Is it now? That would make you either obtuse or disingenuous...so which is it?

 

So would withdrawing from the ECHR and introducing a British Bill of Rights cause quasi-anarchy or not? And if it did how would it manifest, what would happen, what would the consequences be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So would withdrawing from the ECHR and introducing a British Bill of Rights cause quasi-anarchy or not? And if it did how would it manifest, what would happen, what would the consequences be?

 

These goalposts are getting pretty hard to keep up with!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.