taxman Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 A terror suspect was considering an indiscriminate Mumbai-style attack and had an address for Tony Blair and his wife, Cherie, the Old Bailey has heard. In a further development this afternoon the judge has ruled that certain aspects of the trial can never be revealed and has warned jurors and a selected group of press that whatever they hear in the private session can never be repeated. I'm only presuming that the secret aspects of the trial will relate to activities of the security service and their methods of intelligence gathering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L00b Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 In a further development this afternoon the judge has ruled that certain aspects of the trial can never be revealed and has warned jurors and a selected group of press that whatever they hear in the private session can never be repeated.Why is the press allowed to attend the private session, would be my immediate question. It's not as if due process would be impaired, since a jury has been convened. The logic approach would be to remove the disclosure risk factor at source (no press altogether), than try to mitigate it in advance with a threat of contempt of court (press allowed, but no saying this-that-the other). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fogey Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Can NEVER be revealed. This is just plain wrong. I understand the need for secrecy and to protect operatives but this feels so utterly and completely wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Joker Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 A terror suspect was considering an indiscriminate Mumbai-style attack and had an address for Tony Blair and his wife, Cherie, the Old Bailey has heard. Bliar amassed quite an extensive property portfolio while ruining running the country. Little wonder the attack failed; they couldn't recruit enough suicide bombers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafodil Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Bliar amassed quite an extensive property portfolio while ruining running the country. Little wonder the attack failed; they couldn't recruit enough suicide bombers. But Tony and Cherry are socialists surely they would not need more than one house. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxman Posted October 14, 2014 Author Share Posted October 14, 2014 But Tony and Cherry are socialists surely they would not need more than one house. You poor deluded soul, how on earth did you come to that conclusion? Maybe you need to read more about Socialism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanerothyme Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Bliar amassed quite an extensive property portfolio while ruining running the country. Little wonder the attack failed; they couldn't recruit enough suicide bombers. Blair is going to be more reviled than Thatcher, but it's not really important whether that's rightfully or wrongfully so. ^~that's your legacy, right there, Tony; if you're reading this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erebus Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Not before time, Blair & Bush were the front for a criminal action that has led to ISIS, through the invasion of a sovereign state, which had been under sanctions thus economically crippled, which the power of might smashed to bit. If people like him can get away with carnage, then it leaves the door open for others to imitate. Just wait till the news comes out of IS using chemical weapons, supplied by the good side of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexo Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 (edited) In a further development this afternoon the judge has ruled that certain aspects of the trial can never be revealed and has warned jurors and a selected group of press that whatever they hear in the private session can never be repeated. And another part of the trial will be in secret without any press. I know that Blair lives on Connaught Square ( ) and I think he needs a good slap for starting the Iraq war on a pack of lies. His beheading might be justifiable. What more do I need to get myself a secret trial for thought crimes? Edited October 14, 2014 by Flexo Added the video of the new plaque in the Connaught Square communal garden to commerate the hundreds of thousands of deaths. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonny5 Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Blair is going to be more reviled than Thatcher, but it's not really important whether that's rightfully or wrongfully so. ^~that's your legacy, right there, Tony; if you're reading this. Thatcher could have had a state funeral if she'd agreed to it while she was alive. I suspect that Tony would be delighted with that level of revulsion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now