Jump to content

Lords refuse to cut costs because 'champagne quality would suffer'


Recommended Posts

What really ****** me off is that the Houses of Parliament is the only public service I know where market reforms have not been introduced.

The House of Lords and Commons do similar jobs, why have both? Why not let members both of them compete for votes the one with the most votes wins. They like competition in public services, it drives up standards and efficiency, apparently.

All these arguments made by the puffed up and pompous about the need for a revising chamber made up of the great and the good flies in the face of competition, and is made by their lordships who are against change and just want to defend Spanish practices like the one quoted above by the OP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, esme, there are few things in life as disappointing as cheap Champers.

 

It isn't my drink of choice, but just like Bordeaux, it does need to be disgracefully expensive to be worthwhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm waiting for the day when they are all photographed in their pyjamas at the door and labelled 'SCROUNGERS' in 2 inch letters across the front of the Daily Mail, or when they appear on 'Saints and Scroungers'. Until then, I'll treat the Daily Mail and the BBC with the same contempt as our 'representatives'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.