Solomon1 Posted January 4, 2015 Share Posted January 4, 2015 A fine idea. Maybe install a cross section of society as the board. Those who have contributed in a societal sense. Exactly A similar selection process to adoption councils, juries etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted January 4, 2015 Share Posted January 4, 2015 Those who have contributed in a societal sense. Charity workers, like Jimmy Saville? A similar selection process to [...] juries etc Random selections from the electoral register. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted January 4, 2015 Share Posted January 4, 2015 A fine idea. Maybe install a cross section of society as the board. Those who have contributed in a societal sense. You keep negating yourself from the equation with such nonsense...back to redtube with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon1 Posted January 4, 2015 Share Posted January 4, 2015 Charity workers, like Jimmy Saville? Jimmy Saville was not part of adoption services or on a jury What is your point Chris? ---------- Post added 04-01-2015 at 14:41 ---------- You keep negating yourself from the equation with such nonsense...back to redtube with you. How is this a negation Ron? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted January 4, 2015 Share Posted January 4, 2015 Jimmy Saville was not part of adoption services or on a jury I never said he was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon1 Posted January 4, 2015 Share Posted January 4, 2015 I never said he was. So what's your point Chris, for the *2nd time*? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted January 4, 2015 Share Posted January 4, 2015 So what's your point Chris, for the *2nd time*? Hahaha. [iNSERT Sidetrack with insult.] Trolling 101. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted January 4, 2015 Share Posted January 4, 2015 How is this a negation Ron? Because his moral clock is so frigged up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon1 Posted January 4, 2015 Share Posted January 4, 2015 Hahaha. [iNSERT Sidetrack with insult.] I note that you're avoiding my question For the *3rd time* What's your point Chris? Let's see if we get an answer ---------- Post added 04-01-2015 at 14:45 ---------- Because his moral clock is so frigged up. Please explain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted January 4, 2015 Share Posted January 4, 2015 I don't actually think Solomon1 is genuinely interested in eugenics. He's just found a route to entertain himself for a few hours. Luckily, for all of us, it's an idea that doesn't hold much political weight anymore. I for one, hope it stays that way. It's always been a route to something horrific. ------ I note that you're avoiding my question Don't. You'll make me all sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now