rollwithit Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 On the other hand. Our country is too soft on genuine criminals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonzo77 Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 As if you didn't know the answer to your "I've been under a rock" question Genuinely didn't Pete. But I couldn't give a monkeys whether you believe me or not life's too short haha! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gimp27 Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 Sharia Law. Coming to a city near you shortly. Even the word "Sharia" is pretty vomit inducing. I understand that we in the west are a lot more tolerent with crimes, ie; we dont stone people or chop their heads off, but any mention of this vile law making its way to these shores is just plain sickening. However, if the sympathisers and do-gooders carry on with with this myth that people are racist toward Muslims, then this horrible religion will continue to cut deeper into our social system. People arent racist toward muslims, but they are very much against this barbaric set of rules that this religion stands for, and how far its followers are willing to enforce it. I cant remember any Christians coming out in force, and attacking the Monty Python gang after Life of Brian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mafya Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 The hypocrisy of Saudi Arabia condemning the attacks in Paris whilst carrying out this sentence (originally "only" 600 lashes but deemed too lenient) is staggering. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/07/charlie-hebdo-killings-arab-states-jihadi-extremist-sympathisers-isis It's a bit like the freedom of speech hypocrisy, what about this reporters freedom of speech= http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/tim-willcox-apologises-to-daughter-of-holocaust-survivor-at-paris-rally-for-saying-palestinians-suffer-hugely-at-jewish-hands-as-well-9972840.html Double standards as usual but if muslims are getting offended they are expected take it on the chin under the freedom of speech banner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roosterboost Posted January 18, 2015 Author Share Posted January 18, 2015 It's a bit like the freedom of speech hypocrisy, what about this reporters freedom of speech= http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/tim-willcox-apologises-to-daughter-of-holocaust-survivor-at-paris-rally-for-saying-palestinians-suffer-hugely-at-jewish-hands-as-well-9972840.html Double standards as usual but if muslims are getting offended they are expected take it on the chin under the freedom of speech banner. How many were shot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mafya Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 How many were shot? That's irrelevant..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johncocker Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 Have you got a problem with the way you answer questions or something? No. you have . plus instead of getting angry about being sprung trolling on SF stay under that rock you say you live under, google the poor innocent man we are disscusing , get angry about that and stop playing the naive prat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xt500 Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 On the other hand. Our country is too soft on genuine criminals. Yes they don't even look for them,too busy with speeding tickets lol when was the last time you saw a policeman without a camera in his hand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamo Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 It's a bit like the freedom of speech hypocrisy, what about this reporters freedom of speech= http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/tim-willcox-apologises-to-daughter-of-holocaust-survivor-at-paris-rally-for-saying-palestinians-suffer-hugely-at-jewish-hands-as-well-9972840.html Double standards as usual but if muslims are getting offended they are expected take it on the chin under the freedom of speech banner. Here is an example of a newspaper apologies for printing cartoons of Muhammad. Freedom of speech does not prohibit someone from apologising for causing offence if they want to and it doesn't change the fact that they are legally entitled to cause offence. There is no double standard... you need to brush that chip off your shoulder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L00b Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 It's a bit like the freedom of speech hypocrisy, what about this reporters freedom of speech= http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/tim-willcox-apologises-to-daughter-of-holocaust-survivor-at-paris-rally-for-saying-palestinians-suffer-hugely-at-jewish-hands-as-well-9972840.html Has Tim Wilcox been shot? flogged? threatened by Mossad? Don't mistake enforced political correctness (no doubt at the hands of BBC head office: Tim, apologise or lose your job) for 'double standards'. FWIW, I don't believe that Tim Wilcox had anything to apologise for. Double standards as usual but if muslims are getting offended they are expected take it on the chin under the freedom of speech banner. Historically, in satirical terms at least, Jews, Catholics and political extremists <etc.> have been "taking it on the chin" far longer than Muslims. They've not shot, flogged, bombed, threatened <etc.> the satirists, that said. Take a leaf from their book? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now