mossdog Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 That's precisely what you do isn't it?No !!............but I do throw my hands up in the air in disbelief at your posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roosterboost Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 No, I didn't say that at all..and you know quite well what I said..there is nothing "nice" about nutters in vests. Because I state their intent differs from you believing their intent was to kill as many isn't an apology for how many less they murdered. That was your bizarre interpretation, not mine. They don't have to kill large numbers of Americans you imbecile..that's the point..you just have to behead one and you'll still get the same response as beheading 50 from the Americans..they don't differentiate. One American has the same value as 10 or 50. On American soil also plays a substantial part of American psyche. No they weren't, they were trying and succeeded in taking out the towers for a specific reason, otherwise they could have just waited for a ball game. As i pointed out, If they wanted numbers they only had to delay for a short while and totted up to genocidal proportions...so effectively if the numbers game is your game then it's you that apologizes for those poor Islamic nutters for not getting it right. See what I did there? Wouldn't attempting to hijack a plane 2 hours after the first ones be somewhat after the cat was out the bag? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xt500 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Wouldn't attempting to hijack a plane 2 hours after the first ones be somewhat after the cat was out the bag? LOL it really does amaze me how some people think,or rather don't! what if ALL the planes were hijacked 2 hours later? That's if you believe that crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charmer Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Although I personally consider Blair to be far and away the worst prime minister there's been in my lifetime, people still don't love him or loathe him in the same way they did Thatcher. She attracted a very special sort of loathing from many, many people. Yes, short sighted selfish people who think that the world should stand still and that the state owed them a living. The sort of loathing that led to her winning three consecutive elections with huge majorities. The sort of loathing that led to more trade union members voting for her than voted for Labour. The sort of loathing that led to the UK coming from "the sick man of Europe" to leading the free world economically. She restored pride in our country by standing up to an Argentinian fascist junta. She saved our country from revolutionary socialists such as Scargill and the union barons of the time. Her example and challenge to socialism led to the Labour party aping her policies and maintaining a capitalist economy to the benefit of the vast majority of the country. She was, without doubt the greatest PM we ever had in peacetime. Absolutely agree. A British hero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 (edited) Wouldn't attempting to hijack a plane 2 hours after the first ones be somewhat after the cat was out the bag? Non of the planes were hijacked at the same time, non of the planes encountered any resistance from ground or air defense, other than the one by the passengers. 1:20hrs elapsed from the 1st takeover to the last...apparently. So theoretically the cat was out of the bag. Edited January 22, 2015 by ronthenekred Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xt500 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Non of the planes were hijacked at the same time, non of the planes encountered any resistance from ground or air defense, other than the one by the passengers. 1:20hrs elapsed from the 1st takeover to the last...apparently. ah the invisible one, flight 93,the one the cornoner said,........... It's all aircraft parts, no human remains.....It was as if the plane had stopped and let the passengers off before it........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 (edited) ah the invisible one, flight 93,the one the cornoner said,........... It's all aircraft parts, no human remains.....It was as if the plane had stopped and let the passengers off before it........... What are you blathering on about? Edited January 22, 2015 by ronthenekred Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xt500 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 What are you blathering on about? Nothing you would understand.That would take a touch of intelligence! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Nothing you would understand.That would take a touch of intelligence! Then explain to the rest of the participants...if you're able that is, instead of partaking with gibberish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xt500 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Then explain to the rest of the participants...if you're able that is, instead of partaking with gibberish. yes sir lol hey if its over your head,then find a easier to understand thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now