Maz3 Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 These should be banned. They instantly make the baby look uglier, older, more knowing and less likeable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SportsTrophy Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 I think they are great for recognition when you can't tell if it's a boy or a girl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza58 Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 I think they look well cute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikita Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 I think they look well cute. They do look cute on some babys,But they must be blooming uncomfortable to wear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aliceBB Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 These should be banned. They instantly make the baby look uglier, older, more knowing and less likeable. Agreed. Babies which have been 'accessorised' unsettle me, generally. It's bad enough when they are dressed in designer label clothes - and brand trainers, when they can't even walk yet. If the parents wanted something to dress up, they could have got a doll or a dog or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olive Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 These should be banned. They instantly make the baby look uglier, older, more knowing and less likeable. Oo, they're 'orrible aren't they? Seen a few pictures of babies with these on recently. Something a bit freaky about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lindylou53 Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 To say nothing of babies with pierced ears... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
francypants Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Maz ..... I agree, these bands are hideous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RootsBooster Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 They do look cute on some babys,But they must be blooming uncomfortable to wear. They are, but that's because they're only meant to fit on babies' heads Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aliceBB Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 To say nothing of babies with pierced ears... They are even worse, aren't they. In France this summer we saw a sandwich board advertising a tattoo parlour, with babies no older than 9 months covered in tattoos, chains and piercings. It was horrible - I can only hope the tattoos, etc., were photoshopped on. Surely it's illegal to tattoo babies? ---------- Post added 11-03-2015 at 22:06 ---------- I think they are great for recognition when you can't tell if it's a boy or a girl What's wrong with asking the parent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now