libuse Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 It was a sound idea but any idea needs 100% support from those expected to make it work. May I ask what you think was sound about it? In what way is a CCG naturally superior or preferential to a PCT? Doesn't the lack of geographic obligation in new tenders open up horrific problems and pave the way for mandatory health insurance? Are you sure that the cost of the restructure has been justified? Why do you think the risk register wasn't opened up to scrutiny? I would hazard a guess that you may not be that familiar with the HSCA 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loraward Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 May I ask what you think was sound about it? In what way is a CCG naturally superior or preferential to a PCT? Doesn't the lack of geographic obligation in new tenders open up horrific problems and pave the way for mandatory health insurance? Are you sure that the cost of the restructure has been justified? Why do you think the risk register wasn't opened up to scrutiny? I would hazard a guess that you may not be that familiar with the HSCA 2012 Why do you think it wasn't a sound idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
libuse Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Why do you think it wasn't a sound idea? Mostly, excessive expenditure with no tested or proven benefits and the lack of geographical obligation in tenders. Again, why do you think it was sound? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now