Jump to content

Rent controls - good or bad?


Recommended Posts

Landlords are not a collective group. They are in competition with each other. This competition means that the market price is determined by supply and demand.

If prices go up due to a shortage, more people buy into the market because they see a potential profit, they then undercut the existing players in order to gain market share.

 

It's basic economics 101. Supply and demand.

 

I'm not disagreeing with the basic definition of supply and demand. But more renters flooding the market, not enough houses being built and no rental controls is a recipe for disaster.

 

---------- Post added 30-04-2015 at 11:30 ----------

 

Well all the new immigrants seem to be able to find homes. If they cant then they don't have to work in London - they could move somewhere else. Sheffield property is quite cheap. Rotherham is cheaper.

 

like this? http://www.theguardian.com/society/2012/apr/24/tory-westminster-council-tenants-derby

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not disagreeing with the basic definition of supply and demand. But more renters flooding the market, not enough houses being built and no rental controls is a recipe for disaster.

 

---------- Post added 30-04-2015 at 11:30 ----------

 

 

like this? http://www.theguardian.com/society/2012/apr/24/tory-westminster-council-tenants-derby

 

 

Absolutely. If people want to move they can. Obviously they shouldn't be forced to, as Grant Schapps says, but if they want to they can.

Try to ignore the Grauniad's bias and mischief making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said to quote in full:

 

Yep, if you want a snapshot of inflation look at the prices of milk and bread.

 

That's right. You said Yes to the question I asked, did you think milk prices were legally linked to inflation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's right. You said Yes to the question I asked, did you think milk prices were legally linked to inflation.

 

I said to quote in full:

 

Yep, if you want a snapshot of inflation look at the prices of milk and bread.

 

---------- Post added 30-04-2015 at 11:54 ----------

 

quite an interesting article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/money-saving-tips/11410509/When-will-a-loaf-of-bread-cost-21.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

stop, blithering on about the price of milk!

 

Landlords are not a collective group. They are in competition with each other. This competition means that the market price is determined by supply and demand.

If prices go up due to a shortage, more people buy into the market because they see a potential profit, they then undercut the existing players in order to gain market share.

 

It's basic economics 101. Supply and demand.

 

But that's simply not true, it's applicable to milk and coal and loads of other stuff but it's not applicable to housing.

 

houses, weather it be purchase price or rental cost just don't get any cheaper because of supply and demand. The prices just continue upwards.

 

 

It could be like that, but it's not

Edited by psynuk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What? .... there are no market forces on the price of milk???

 

If grocery prices had increased at the same rate as house prices since 1971, then:

A 4-pint carton of milk would cost £10.45

A chicken would cost £51.18

A bunch of 6 bananas would cost £8.47

A box of 6 eggs would cost £5.01

A loaf of sliced white bread would cost £4.36

A leg of lamb would cost £53.18

The average weekly expenditure on food for a family of four would be £453.23.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

milk is linked to deflation and inflation not 'supply and demand'.

 

Don't be ridiculous.

 

---------- Post added 30-04-2015 at 15:38 ----------

 

stop, blithering on about the price of milk!

 

 

 

But that's simply not true, it's applicable to milk and coal and loads of other stuff but it's not applicable to housing.

 

houses, weather it be purchase price or rental cost just don't get any cheaper because of supply and demand. The prices just continue upwards.

 

 

It could be like that, but it's not

It is like that, but supply is limited and demand ever increasing. That's why it appears to be always upwards.

 

Re:blithering on, it's a comparison, an entirely valid one.

 

---------- Post added 30-04-2015 at 15:40 ----------

 

If grocery prices had increased at the same rate as house prices since 1971, then:

A 4-pint carton of milk would cost £10.45

A chicken would cost £51.18

A bunch of 6 bananas would cost £8.47

A box of 6 eggs would cost £5.01

A loaf of sliced white bread would cost £4.36

A leg of lamb would cost £53.18

The average weekly expenditure on food for a family of four would be £453.23.

 

What's your point? Inflation on house prices has been higher than on groceries, yes. Both are affected by market forces, supply and demand. Unfortunately the supply of houses is limited.

Edited by Cyclone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.