Jump to content

Labour to get rid of Bedroom Tax if elected


Recommended Posts

There isnt smaller accomodation in either private or public.

 

So the 276, one to two bedroom houses for rent in Sheffield (3 mile radius) now for between £100-£600 per month on Rightmove are fake are they?

 

Change the search parameters to one to three bedroom and the number jumps to 500 available properties.

Edited by Berberis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which areas have this large surplus of 3 bedroom Council houses?

 

---------- Post added 01-05-2015 at 08:01 ----------

 

 

Tax has been cut by this government and It's only fair that large state funded houses are freed up by those people that don't need them, so that people that do need them get get them.

 

Here's an article on the BBC which shows the problem.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23122369

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold on a sec, the Tories want to give people the right to buy HA houses. If they get sold off they are no longer available to be allocated.

 

A recent study showed that taxes have been raised by £255 a person in this parliament

 

Selling it doesn't reduce supply, the house still exists and someone will still be living in it. My understanding is that they intend to use the money they get form the sales to build more, which means selling them will increase supply.

 

I'm sure some will be paying more tax but some will also be paying less tax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if Labour do get rid of the bedroom tax, the damage will already have been done for a lot of people.

 

And the benefit of a family home for a family will have been had and continue to be had for a lot of people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Genuine question..How does that stand historically ..? over 5 years that's only £50 a year...

 

Maybe it is, but the point I'm countering is that the coalition has cut taxes. Overall it hasn't.

 

http://election2015.ifs.org.uk/article/the-coalition-government-s-record-on-tax

 

Some taxes are reduced, others increased but the net increase per person is above £250.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it is, but the point I'm countering is that the coalition has cut taxes. Overall it hasn't.

 

http://election2015.ifs.org.uk/article/the-coalition-government-s-record-on-tax

 

Some taxes are reduced, others increased but the net increase per person is above £250.

 

And yet Cameron on Question time said he had reduced the welfare budget by £20 Billion during his rule, so one would expect some form of tax rebate.

 

I'd loved to have been on question time just to ask exactly what the saving has been spent on. As said earlier, it certainly has not benefited the average taxpayer except make those who don't receive benefits feel better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And yet Cameron on Question time said he had reduced the welfare budget by £20 Billion during his rule, so one would expect some form of tax rebate.

 

I'd loved to have been on question time just to ask exactly what the saving has been spent on. As said earlier, it certainly has not benefited the average taxpayer except make those who don't receive benefits feel better.

 

He hasn't reduced the Welfare Bill at all, it's one of those disgraceful lies the scrote keeps coming out with.

 

Here's the link Welfare spending has gone up and I think if you listen to his words he says he saves the money if it had been paid at previous levels which is probably accurate.

 

So in reality there's more people needing Welfare and they are getting less which means the overall cost is more.

http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/spending_chart_2000_2018UKb_40t

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He hasn't reduced the Welfare Bill at all, it's one of those disgraceful lies the scrote keeps coming out with.

 

Here's the link Welfare spending has gone up and I think if you listen to his words he says he saves the money if it had been paid at previous levels which is probably accurate.

 

So in reality there's more people needing Welfare and they are getting less which means the overall cost is more.

http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/spending_chart_2000_2018UKb_40t

 

I agree that its just lies but what amazes me is how many here seem to fall for his spin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.