poppet2 Posted June 15, 2015 Author Share Posted June 15, 2015 (edited) So why should such an HA be asset-stripped? I asked the same question in my post #5. However, when I learnt that some HAs gained some form of subsidy from the government or even free land, it was then I began to question, why the Conservatives felt they had every right too strip these HAs of their assets. The Tories obviously believe that those HAs that have been given free land by the local council or government, gives them the right to strip these HAs of their assets. As for those other HAs who have received no such subsidy from the government, I can't see it as being fair. Edited June 15, 2015 by poppet2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 I'd probably agree with you- but only in cases where HAs...have been given free land by the local council or government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cid Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 Not sure what criteria will exempt private landlords, but perhaps HA will be able to tweak their status in order to make them exempt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now