Jump to content

Right To Buy HA legal challenge


Recommended Posts

The problem is that most of the suitable places to build houses are also the most suitable place to produce food.

 

Does that mean that most of the suitable places to produce food are also the most suitable places to build houses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that most of the suitable places to build houses are also the most suitable place to produce food.

 

What?? Brownfield sites?? How much food is grown on places like the old steel works site out by Wincobank??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really?? There are NO new people wanting rented housing? No children wanting to leave home? no divorces creating double families?? no immigrants, legal or otherwise??? How has that happened? Population growth has ended? Excellent news. Oh, hang on.....

 

In which post did I say anything that would suggest that, I simply said that selling one house to the tenant that lives in it, removes one house that is available for rent and one family in need of an house to rent.

 

If the Tories do as they say a new house will be built in place of the one that is sold, if this happens then the plan reduces the number of people wanting to rent without decreasing the number of properties to rent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, but eventually that tenant will move on somewhere and release the RENTED house back into the pool, but if its been sold then it vanishes forever for those who need social housing and cant afford to be tories

 

It will increase the number of affordable houses for sale so more people will be able to buy instead of renting which will again reduce the number wanting to rent. The house still exists and will still be occupied by some one that needs an house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most? Not really. We have loads of agricultural land sat idle while farmers cream off EU subsidies for leaving it idle.

 

It's about getting a balance. Use some of it. Leave most of it alone.

 

Why does all new housing have to be on greenbelt land whats wrong with brownfield sites?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to be the general tory policy and they are in charge so thats life

 

I agree with much of what the tories do and say. Most of it probably, but this seems wrong. Morally, taking property away from people who own it, is not a Tory thing to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If the Tories do as they say a new house will be built in place of the one that is sold, if this happens then the plan reduces the number of people wanting to rent without decreasing the number of properties to rent.

 

And you honestly think that the tories will do that???? No way, they will just take the money, hand it to the rich and run to a tax haven

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.