Harrystottle Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 Don't the subs need a deep water harbour? Other than that I agree with Cuttsie. There are places in England or Wales that would love to have Trident and the jobs that go with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evil woman Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 The clue is in the Party name. You do know that as many folk voted against the SNP in Scotland as voted for them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SqueakyPete Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 SNP's success is everything to do with nationalists,and the backlash of angry Scots that didn't get their own way last year. Plus the SNP's speeches sound like they were wrote by William Wallace himself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Joker Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 just nuke Scotland and be done with this whole farcical episode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harvey19 Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 An interesting point. If people thought of the implications of their desires maybe they would think again. It is like when people want to end the monarchy, do they realise how many people depend on it for their employment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Hans Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 I just don't understand the argument for not having Trident, it's usually like "HURRRRRR DURRRR YE BUT WER NUT GON GET ATTAKED ANYWAYZ" Well yeah, it's a deterrent, so people don't attack us. Ridiculous, these hippies are starting to do my head in thinking the world is made of rainbows and roses. No, it isn't. It's made of threats and wars and death and fighting and we need a force to deter that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Joker Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 I just don't understand the argument for not having Trident, it's usually like "HURRRRRR DURRRR YE BUT WER NUT GON GET ATTAKED ANYWAYZ" Well yeah, it's a deterrent, so people don't attack us. yeah, let's nuke al qaeda and turn Afghanistan into er, rubble! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retep Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 yeah, let's nuke al qaeda and turn Afghanistan into er, rubble! No change there then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Joker Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 No change there then. correct! . . . which is the reason it's a waste of money. . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingjimmy Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 (edited) I just don't understand the argument for not having Trident, it's usually like "HURRRRRR DURRRR YE BUT WER NUT GON GET ATTAKED ANYWAYZ" Well yeah, it's a deterrent, so people don't attack us. Ridiculous, these hippies are starting to do my head in thinking the world is made of rainbows and roses. No, it isn't. It's made of threats and wars and death and fighting and we need a force to deter that. So... seeing as you're so sure of its value as a deterrent you should have no problem telling us who exactly is it currently deterring from doing what? Edited May 9, 2015 by flamingjimmy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now