lil-minx92 Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financial-crime/11554471/British-Flash-Crash-trader-faces-20-years-in-US-jail-if-found-guilty.html Can't help wondering why one bloke who made a load of money from his bedroom trading the stock market using allegedly illegal practices faces a lengthy prison term, when professional banks rig interest rates / money launder / knowingly aid tax evasion etc etc etc, and just fined. One rule for the big boys and another for everyone else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaati Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 Of course it isn't fair! All of em should be banged up for it, not just one bloke! (yes he shouldn't have done it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Joker Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 It's like the Barings bank debacle, where Nick Leeson lost hundreds of millions of pounds . . . from people who already had billions stashed away. What's the difference between this kid and the banksters who've ruined national economies through speculation and gambling? Since you're asking, I think this kid deserves a bonus of at least 7 x his annual salary, all paid for by the taxpayer. If we don't acknowledge his contribution to society, he might emigrate to another country and use his talents there instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthernStar Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 I'm sure he's guilty of something but as alisonmanic alluded to he's being made a patsy of so the bigger players never have to answer to their crimes. The US appears to be losing it's collective marbles as it tries to come to terms with not being the number 1 economy anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossdog Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 It's like the Barings bank debacle, where Nick Leeson lost hundreds of millions of pounds . . . from people who already had billions stashed away. What's the difference between this kid and the banksters who've ruined national economies through speculation and gambling? Since you're asking, I think this kid deserves a bonus of at least 7 x his annual salary, all paid for by the taxpayer. If we don't acknowledge his contribution to society, he might emigrate to another country and use his talents there instead. .........agreed to a certain extent!,but c'mon we all speculate and gamble in various ways! and if we did not the banks would be out of business,just like the bookies and the lottery! Banks lent money to people that should have known better,but got caught in a feeding frenzy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tzijlstra Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 It's like the Barings bank debacle, where Nick Leeson lost hundreds of millions of pounds . . . from people who already had billions stashed away. What's the difference between this kid and the banksters who've ruined national economies through speculation and gambling? Since you're asking, I think this kid deserves a bonus of at least 7 x his annual salary, all paid for by the taxpayer. If we don't acknowledge his contribution to society, he might emigrate to another country and use his talents there instead. Funny you mention that, as it was the first step to the recent banking crisis. ABN AMRO buying the devalued stock of Barings is what triggered the then CEO to buy more bad debts (as their stock soared after acquiring the trash Leeson left), if it worked once, it would work again, right?). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now