Jump to content

Rail strike on the cards


Recommended Posts

It seems people are totally unaware that in the the UK, privatised railway services are subsidised more heavily than under British Rail.

remind us again who privatised the railways

 

---------- Post added 26-05-2015 at 17:21 ----------

 

The working people are this country, why would we want to bring it to a standstill?

 

We have a democratically elected government and with quite a mandate at that. No use throwing our toys out of the pram now.

you said you would like a pay rise how would you go about achieving that ? and the workers voted to strike and the unions went ahead with their wishes and got the required result :hihi:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all a big game on both sides. The unions need to appear to have a purpose (they do on an individual level and I'm recommend joining for that) to justify the pay for the senior negotiators, and the government negotiators are on the same gravy train so it's in neither side's interest to simply sit down chat through option sensibly and come to a fair agreement on both sides. The governments offers far less than it expects to pay, the union demands far more than it knows is fair and achievable and the game of brinkmanship starts. Absolutely pathetic on both sides. Get staff on remuneration boards so they can understand logic behind pay decisions (both government and private companies). It's not as clear cut as the company made 10% more profit than last year so staff should get a 10% pay rise. Involve good staff in those conversations and you'll have their buy in and if you treat them badly and do not give a fair and reasonable pay rise then you'll lose the staff as the representative will make sure word gets around. It would hold boards more to account to their own staff, but would also (I hope) educate lower level staff that profit does not equal affordability for pay rise etc. This them and us culture is bad for both sides and collaboration and transparency is the way forward. Unless of course your company is totally shafting it's staff then I can see why they'd not be in favour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

remind us again who privatised the railways

 

---------- Post added 26-05-2015 at 17:21 ----------

 

you said you would like a pay rise how would you go about achieving that ? and the workers voted to strike and the unions went ahead with their wishes and got the required result :hihi:

 

Remind us again who could have stopped it or at the very least renationalised in 13 years of government with a decent economy and a huge majority? Blair fell over himself to rubber stamp rail privatisation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there any specifics on what is wrong with the pay offer now??

 

Last time they wanted a larger than £500 single payment, the strike was called off so I assume they got it.

 

Was that offer then taken back or something??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure it has, particularly with folk who work in the private sector and who do not benefit from index linked final salary pensions and retirement at 55. I'm pretty sure many of them have little sympathy with folks who do but still expect the rest of us to dig deeper so that they can have a little more.

 

Bring on the driverless trains.

 

If you had a clue what you were talking about, you would know that this dispute is not about train drivers at all.

Train drivers' union is ASLEF not RMT.

 

---------- Post added 01-06-2015 at 00:55 ----------

 

Why not? I imagine a proportion of all workers would like a pay rise but we're not all in a position to hold the country to ransom.

 

How many of the employees voted to strike? A little under half?

Edited by mancmart
Grammer error
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there any specifics on what is wrong with the pay offer now??

 

Last time they wanted a larger than £500 single payment, the strike was called off so I assume they got it.

 

Was that offer then taken back or something??

 

Nope the unions took the offer to their members and they voted no they wanted more money. Its off again now. So who knows weather the greedy folk will say no again and ask for more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.