Bigthumb Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 I've just read that Hazel Blears, who stood down as an MP a few days ago is to become a director of the Co-op Bank. Her salary is said to be £60,000 for which "Ms Blears will be expected to work a minimum of one to two days a month". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny_Boy Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 £60k isn't a big salary for a director of a large financial institution. But working 2/3 days a month, well that'd be nice wouldn't it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_bloke Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 Hazel 'Champagne Socialist and Expenses Scandal' Blears in paid-for-not-doing-much shocker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECCOnoob Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 (edited) I've just read that Hazel Blears, who stood down as an MP a few days ago is to become a director of the Co-op Bank. Her salary is said to be £60,000 for which "Ms Blears will be expected to work a minimum of one to two days a month". Ok, lets put a little context to your post. Firstly, £60,000 may well be a lot of money to us, but for company directors are board members in the big wide world, its a snip. Most Executive Board Members are on millions a year. Take a look at what most executive directors are on and that really would make your eyes water. Barclays Banker Bob earned 18.1 million recently, even concession for working full time, it still puts Hazel's part time salary as pocket change in fact 19x her amount if he choose to work the same amount of days. Secondly, the members voted for her and they would have been in agreement to her salary. Thirdly, its a private company funded by shareholders. Its no longer the wonderful membership union utopia it once was. In the big bad commercial world they pay market rate for who they want. If they want some useless ex labour party chump on their board to allegedly "...hold the chief executive and higher management of the group to account..." they are free to do so. Where is the "gravy train" here. Edited May 20, 2015 by ECCOnoob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Joker Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 If they want some useless ex labour party chump on their board to allegedly "...hold the chief executive and higher management of the group to account..." they are free to do so. I'd only charge £59,999.99 a year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigthumb Posted May 20, 2015 Author Share Posted May 20, 2015 £60k isn't a big salary for a director of a large financial institution. But working 2/3 days a month, well that'd be nice wouldn't it. I should imagine working 1 or 2 would be even nicer. Just what qualifications do you need to be nominated to be director of a bank that sponsors rather a lot of MPs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_bloke Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 I should imagine working 1 or 2 would be even nicer. Just what qualifications do you need to be nominated to be director of a bank that sponsors rather a lot of MPs? A drug habit and skills with fiddling expenses and cooking the books? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Flowers_%28banker%29 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveJ68 Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 What do the forums banking experts think about this? http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/may/20/banks-hit-by-record-57bn-fine-for-rigging-forex-markets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 I'd only charge £59,999.99 a year Let's jobshare on a day each for £30k a year Seriously though, we're probably as well qualified as Blears. ---------- Post added 20-05-2015 at 22:25 ---------- What do the forums banking experts think about this? http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/may/20/banks-hit-by-record-57bn-fine-for-rigging-forex-markets Quite incredible really. Brazen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted May 21, 2015 Share Posted May 21, 2015 Hazel 'Champagne Socialist and Expenses Scandal' Blears in paid-for-not-doing-much shocker. I'd hardly call Hazel Blears a champagne socialist - she never tired of telling people that her brother is a bus driver, as if somehow that bolstered her credibility. I'll never forget hearing her hard line approach to 'welfare scroungers' while she brazenly claimed maximum expenses, 'flipped' her home 3 times in one year, then when found out, then waved the cheque she wrote to pay back the money on television. http://www.leftfutures.org/2014/02/a-dishonourable-discharge-for-hazel-blears/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now