I1L2T3 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 You seem to infer that just because "hundreds and thousands" take to the street they must be right. Hundreds and thousands took to the streets to support Hitler, they still do to support Putin and the North Korean dictatorship. Human beings, I regret to say, are easily swayed. One of the biggest marches seen in London in recent years was countryside campaigners. I agree with you. They were wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonJeremy Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 One of the biggest marches seen in London in recent years was countryside campaigners. I agree with you. They were wrong. Only they weren't. They were right. They were the countryside. They were being dictated To by the townies. People who didn't and don't understand. They were trampled over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 Only they weren't. They were right. They were the countryside. They were being dictated To by the townies. People who didn't and don't understand. They were trampled over. I was being facetious. Obviously sometimes a mass protest can be a force for good, the anti-war protests over Iraq another example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 Only they weren't. They were right. They were the countryside. They were being dictated To by the townies. People who didn't and don't understand. They were trampled over. As someone who has worked on a farm, spent countless hours in the countryside and lived on the fringes of it a lot of my life I object to being told I object to fox hunting "because I don't understand it". ******** to ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonJeremy Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 As someone who has worked on a farm, spent countless hours in the countryside and lived on the fringes of it a lot of my life I object to being told I object to fox hunting "because I don't understand it". ******** to ya. Fair enough if you have. I have no doubt plenty of countryside dwellers do object. BTW. What are the fringes of the countryside? That'll be the town then, will it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Gobby Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 Hi everyone Just heard this quote from our führer Cameron... "For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'" This is what Max Keiser had to say about it. Not good! And so it begins.... Ok so he's an idiot, got better things to do than listen to this crap!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 Fair enough if you have. I have no doubt plenty of countryside dwellers do object. BTW. What are the fringes of the countryside? That'll be the town then, will it? No, a village. One had its own hunt. I've been minding my own business in the country on a couple of occasions only to have a hunt plough on past me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonJeremy Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 No, a village. One had its own hunt. I've been minding my own business in the country on a couple of occasions only to have a hunt plough on past me. Ah. Yes. They'll do that. Mind you, it is the best and most humane way to control unhealthy foxes. Was it the Barlow? If it was they hardly ever catch one anyway. Befor the ban of course. Now they only accidentally hardly ever catch one whilst they are out on a random ride in the countryside with hounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrNorm Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 As long as the Security Services and Police are accountable, as they clearly are, ... ??? ... another thread maybe on law enforcement ... then they should be given the powers they require to protect us. I have no problem with powers being given to enforce fair laws. I am not denying anyone the right to speak their mind except where it is restricted in law, where it insults, belittles, or incites criminal activity of any kind. You support free speech within the law, good. But what about David Cameron's apparent proposal to deny free speech within the law? For too long he says, we've been too tolerant, leaving people alone if they obey the law. He reckons we should interfere more in people's lives. David Cameron He's either "lost it" and we can safely ignore him, or this is indeed deeply disturbing. Cracking up or dangerous? I haven't made my mind up yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon1 Posted May 30, 2015 Author Share Posted May 30, 2015 Ok so he's an idiot, got better things to do than listen to this crap!!!!!!!!!!! This, my friends, is a classic example of Cognitive Dissonance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now