Jump to content

VIP paedophile ring


Recommended Posts

VIPs are being "treated like everyone else". Several are locked up for long sentences. Your problem seems to be that you ignore the basic principle of English law in that in order to convict you have to have proof.

 

No doubt some will get away with it, an equal number may well be accused unfairly, implementation of the law is not easy, nor should it be.

 

MPs have now quietly passed a new law, pushed through Parliament last night, so that they can no longer be named if they are arrested. (Daily Mai, page 2, 11.02.16)

 

How equal is that?

 

What with that, and Leveson, plus their desire to close down the Freedom of Information Act and anyone would think they had something to hide...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re VIP peado ring.

 

There isnt one never was. Move on.

 

Really? Until 2035 when we will be looking back at 'historical' child abuse that took place in the 2010s, but the perpetrators have died, or are suffering from dementia, and cannot be charged...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VIPs are being "treated like everyone else". Several are locked up for long sentences. Your problem seems to be that you ignore the basic principle of English law in that in order to convict you have to have proof.

 

No doubt some will get away with it, an equal number may well be accused unfairly, implementation of the law is not easy, nor should it be.

 

 

How?

 

......................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re VIP peado ring.

 

There isnt one never was. Move on.

 

Says you. :suspect:

 

---------- Post added 12-02-2016 at 09:12 ----------

 

Really? Until 2035 when we will be looking back at 'historical' child abuse that took place in the 2010s, but the perpetrators have died, or are suffering from dementia, and cannot be charged...

 

It's been investigated. They found no evidence. The one that claimed to have dementia died of dementia shortly afterwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How?

 

......................

No evidence.

 

---------- Post added 12-02-2016 at 13:08 ----------

 

Really? Until 2035 when we will be looking back at 'historical' child abuse that took place in the 2010s, but the perpetrators have died, or are suffering from dementia, and cannot be charged...

 

You are making this up as you go along, there is no evidence. No doubt some people did commit sexual offences 30 years ago and will not be prosecuted. Either the victims cant be bothered to complain, or the "offences" were so marginal it would a waste of time and money to proceed.

 

Why dont you focus on those areas that we know are true and current, the exploitation of children locally by Asian men for instance?

 

Or are you just besotted by the idea of "celebrity".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Her complaint - as if you didn't know - is that people who had celebrity or occupied positions of influence / power were able to use the situation they were in to commit offences against others with impunity and when anyone suggested any wrongdoing or even complained to the police such complaints were ignored, brushed aside or suppressed due to the celebrity or influence of the accused.

 

There is little doubt about the fact it was occurring - it always was and will continue to happen in the future because people will seek to obtain sexual gratification in whatever form appeals to them - the fact they are a celebrity or a person in authority doesn't mean they cease to be human beings with all the foibles that we all know about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The UK's most senior policeman might lose his job over this farce of a case with zero evidence and you're still clinging onto the accusations of a single witness 'Nick' whose own mother says is "delusional".

 

OK.

 

You do seem very desperate to try to spin something of this. :suspect:

 

Most of the detectives drawn from the Met’s sexual abuse and homicide divisions believe Nick is credible.

 

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/14/operation-midland-nick-establishment-sexual-abuse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to keep things up to date: Recent reports of the imminent closure of the VIP sexual abuse inquiry were, it seems, incorrect. The police, are still investigating and are standing by 'Nick.'

 

'An informal review concluded that there was enough material to continue the investigation. Senior sources close to the inquiry have insisted it will continue for some time yet, as there are active lines of inquiry to pursue.

It added that most of its detectives, drawn from sexual abuse and murder units, believe Nick is credible. Sources said that Nick correctly described details of a military building in Southern England where he said abuse had taken place, that were not publicly available.'

Daily Mail. 15.02.16

 

So were the recent, totally unfounded, yet wholly biased headlines, which sought to roundly condemn Nick as a 'serial fantasist' who should be prosecuted and worse etc, just another machiavellian ruse, designed to put off others from coming forward?

Edited by Anna B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.